Hi everyone, I've been wondering for a number of seasons: when are we going to see the end of players with crazy stats?

I'm asking it even more now because I've lost 2 games in a row, mainly because of this total inconsistency.

What coherence is there in having a DF who has 99 in scoring... and nothing elsewhere?
What is the coherence/relevance of this pseudo-cheat player being able to 'annihilate' a striker who has an NG of 99... with three or even 4 stats harmoniously developed????

At the time, when these players first appeared... I considered this to be "using a flaw in the game"... that it was hijacking a technical limitation of the game for the purpose of "manipulating the MDM"...
And many years later, I regret that this bug still exists... and that most of the big teams are starting to use it.

Micky: Bonjour à tous, cela fait de nombreuses saisons que je me pose la question suivante : à quand la fin des joueurs aux stats loufoques ???

Je me la pose encore plus aujourd'hui car je perds 2 matchs de suite à cause notamment de cette incohérence totale.

Quelle est la cohérence d’avoir un DF qui a 99 en marquage... et rien ailleurs ?
Quelle est la cohérence/pertinence que ce pseudo-joueur cheaté puisse "anéantir" un attaquant qui a une NG 99... avec trois voire 4 stats harmonieusement

Play a direct game and his 99-mark dfc will turn into a dfc with no stat and no impact on your attack

Just for your information, and without passing judgement on the content, this is neither a bug nor a flaw, because Aymeric wanted it that way.

Yes, I know... but there's absolutely no logic or coherence to it!

Here, rather than repeating the same thing 50 times over
#forum?topic=167127

Enjoy your reading.

Micky: Oui, je sais... mais ça ne répond à absolument aucune logique ou cohérence !

that's your opinion, you've already asked the question, so you're rambling

Guys... it's time to relax!

Micky à raison ça devient lourd ces marquages moi je déteste rencontrer des équipes avec 2 marquages c'est hallucinant il faudrait mettre le controle antidopage sur vf 🙂

Or you simply need to have variety in your squad to be able to play against all styles of play. That's part of the game's charm.

khad19: Ou il faudrait avoir de la variété dans vos effectifs tout simplement pour pouvoir vous opposer à tout les styles de jeu. C'est le charme du jeu un petit peu quand même.

Exactly.
Instead of complaining about facing players who are formatted like this or like that, train players who are also formatted like that to generate your opponents and you'll realise that it's not that simple and that it takes a lot of sacrifice to get there.

Why not have a championship without style or branding?

Or a championship for each style/branding?

Perso je vous comprends pas 😂 si vous voulez tous jouer à passe courte avec les mdc en défense ou en contre avec les mol en provoquer, faire droite gauche centre droite gauche centre et se faire chier tout les matchs ...

i'm new to the game

trucdefou30: je debute dans le jeu ;et la remarque de micky est justifiée .pour moi c'est une faille de "magouilleurs .".. le jeu est bien pensé et les stats differente dans certaines capacité est judicieuse mais un joueur avec 99 uniquement en marquage est une incoherence .;donc ce joueur a 0 en def et en technique et encore en vitesse ;ne serait bon qu'a marquer un joueur et je ne parle pas de son placement a 0 qui lui empecherai d'etre placer ou le attaquant adverse serait bref ??? mdr pas tres logiqu

There are no shenanigans as long as everyone is free to do the same, and it's not always an advantage if the manager opposite knows how to manage (I'm talking, of course, about an equivalent number of staff)

trucdefou30: je debute dans le jeu ;et la remarque de micky est justifiée .pour moi c'est une faille de "magouilleurs .".. le jeu est bien pensé et les stats differente dans certaines capacité est judicieuse mais un joueur avec 99 uniquement en marquage est une incoherence .;donc ce joueur a 0 en def et en technique et encore en vitesse ;ne serait bon qu'a marquer un joueur et je ne parle pas de son placement a 0 qui lui empecherai d'etre placer ou le attaquant adverse serait bref ??? mdr pas tres logiqu

Anything that is not prohibited by the rules is permitted. Everyone is free to shape their players as they wish. It would be a bit monotonous to always see the same types of characteristics conveyed in the game.
Now, where there could be some change would be linked to their low NG.

trucdefou30: je debute dans le jeu ;et la remarque de micky est justifiée .pour moi c'est une faille de "magouilleurs .".. le jeu est bien pensé et les stats differente dans certaines capacité est judicieuse mais un joueur avec 99 uniquement en marquage est une incoherence .;donc ce joueur a 0 en def et en technique et encore en vitesse ;ne serait bon qu'a marquer un joueur et je ne parle pas de son placement a 0 qui lui empecherai d'etre placer ou le attaquant adverse serait bref ??? mdr pas tres logiqu

The limits of your reasoning become apparent when you realise that many of the characteristics presented in the player profiles should "logically" be useful to any footballer.
After all, what footballer can afford to have 1 in passing, technique or speed?

trucdefou30: je debute dans le jeu ;et la remarque de micky est justifiée .pour moi c'est une faille de "magouilleurs .".. le jeu est bien pensé et les stats differente dans certaines capacité est judicieuse mais un joueur avec 99 uniquement en marquage est une incoherence .;donc ce joueur a 0 en def et en technique et encore en vitesse ;ne serait bon qu'a marquer un joueur et je ne parle pas de son placement a 0 qui lui empecherai d'etre placer ou le attaquant adverse serait bref ??? mdr pas tres logiqu

In fact, as you say you're new to the game, you may be thinking that the game should be a strict reflection of reality.
But the example you've given (...., which you mischaracterise by saying that it's a flaw because it was created by the game's creator) is just one of 10, 20 or 30 examples of the discrepancies between the game and reality.

I won't go back over the perfect example given below by Blagoje on the fact that a 'normal' striker should have, for example, 80 in attack, 40 in technique and 40 in speed, but 1 in passing or 1 in power, and that a midfielder is optimised with 1 in speed and therefore unable to put one foot in front of the other to get out of the centre circle.
You're free to think that would be in line with reality.

As for the dozens of other discrepancies with reality, I can give you a few examples:

• i play direct football with 5 defenders and 5 defensive midfielders but I have 400 attacking stats!
• throughout his career, my goalkeeper has never been injured and has never picked up a single card
• i can buy 20 new players today and sell them all tomorrow to buy another 20 and do this 10, 20 or 30 times a season
• i organise a friendly match against a very poor team, but I still get 50,000 spectators!
  ...probably 10 times more than in reality
• i pay one of my best players €1,000 a week J. Reis
  1 week = 1/8 of a season, i.e. about 1 month. In reality, he would be paid 2 or 300 times more
• i organise a physical preparation course at the start of the season, which costs me €2m. I don't know what the players eat or where they sleep, but in reality it will cost 100 times less.
• i organise a little 'walk in the woods' to recharge my players' batteries
  #events?new it costs me €500,000! In reality, even if I transport my players by helicopter, it will cost me 500 times less.
  etc,....

So a word of advice: play without asking too many questions about the game's settings and take them as they are, as they are and accept them without seeing flaws where there are none.