ultras37 |

20 horas atrás

To be able to develop young players from the youth academy through real matches, training sessions and changes of position… so that they can join the first team already well-trained. In IRL, no first team plays with a player from NG 5. It would be interesting to be able to manage both the professional team and the youth team simultaneously without having to prioritise one over the other.


Esta mensagem foi traduzida. (FR) Mensagem original

David59 |

18 horas atrás

It’s obviously an excellent idea. In fact, it had already been suggested.
However, what I think will bother the MDJ is that there would no longer really be any obligation to train players.

Your proposal effectively means we’d end up being a ‘B team’.

At the moment, we have to keep training sessions in reserve in case a young player gets injured, and make sure they play at least every other day...


Esta mensagem foi traduzida. (FR) Mensagem original

kiki-sainté |

18 horas atrás

It’s a good idea, though. If you’re managing a match in the CDF, you also have to deal with injuries and those infamous transfers. At the moment, when you have too many players, you lose players from the CDF because you can’t take them off; being able to sell them would be good too
But realistically, in the CDF with managed matches – quite frankly, I’m all for it. This is a management game, and at the moment the CDF runs itself.


Esta mensagem foi traduzida. (FR) Mensagem original

Ritter |

15 horas atrás

I think this is a good suggestion. Of course, we’ll need to set some rules, such as not being able to transfer more than one or two players per season, or taking into account injuries, or arriving late for training, and so on. I think this could really liven up this module.


Esta mensagem foi traduzida. (FR) Mensagem original

Galywat |

12 horas atrás

Well, these days you can still develop players and have a competitive team. Obviously, if you’re absolutely determined to try and do everything at once, it doesn’t work. But that’s also the case in real life, since you’re comparing it to real life. Teams focused on development make different choices, whilst teams that want to win everything give young players less playing time.

We now have a compromise that I find interesting.

(Especially as there are fewer restrictions on bringing through young players; there was a time when not bringing a junior through in the year he turned 17 was a major handicap, but things are more flexible these days.)


Esta mensagem foi traduzida. (FR) Mensagem original