Rull43 |

10 dagen geleden

Hello, just out of curiosity, please click on the 👍 if you are AGAINST this new so-called "free" regulation on transfers.
Thank you


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Deck |

10 dagen geleden

If only we had the explanation and the logic behind it to try and understand.

All we had to do was abolish or lower taxes on transfers and agreements to boost transfers and mutual aid. M'enfin...

We'll have to do a poll (it seems to me that the admins can) or create another post with the people "for" just to see.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Rull43 |

9 dagen geleden

UP

62 inches lifted in less than 24 hours

Thank you


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Ced90 |

9 dagen geleden

Rull43: UP

62 pouces levés en moins de 24h

Merci

Out of the 10,000 active employees announced by Aymeric last time, that's not much.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

King |

9 dagen geleden

Rull43: UP

62 pouces levés en moins de 24h

Merci

There's no dislike button, which is a shame.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Jallow |

9 dagen geleden

Ced90: Sur les 10 000 actifs annoncés par Aymeric la dernière fois en vocal, c'est peu

But enough of the active vfo


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

flonaldo |

8 dagen geleden

The end of VF with this new transfer rule...
Unbelievable, given everything we've been through, such as the abusive downgrading of players to reduce clubs' finances a few years ago ....
It shows a lack of respect for the managers, all our efforts and our involvement in developing our clubs and our agreements over the years...
What can I say?


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Misha |

8 dagen geleden

At the very least, the old rules should be reinstated for level 1, 2 and 3 clubs and for exchanges between two clubs more than 3 levels apart. That would already discourage 90% of cash-cow double-accounts.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

8 dagen geleden

If you want to see an end to wheeling and dealing and borderline behaviour (bearing in mind that the line is no longer really drawn), it's simple:

1°) Abolish the possibility of direct transfers. Sales will be made exclusively via auctions (lasting at least 12 hours), which is how things work in many of VF's competitor games.
I can already hear those who are going to say that this takes some of the fun out of the game. True, but it radically prohibits any cheating and you can't make omelettes without breaking eggs.

2°) Loans are automatically 56 days old, with no possibility of early recall.
Here again, I can already hear the whining from those who will say that they have loaned a player to a club that isn't doing its job.
Well, too bad my good man, you only had to think twice before loaning a player to that club, and as I said earlier, you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs!

The implementation of these 2 simple changes, which I don't think require any development, means that 80% of cheating will disappear immediately and 95% of suspicions will disappear. This will allow the admins to devote all their time to tracking down multi-accounts, which, with the two measures mentioned above, would lose a lot of their interest.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

kiki-sainté |

8 dagen geleden

myforsans: Si vous voulez la fin des magouilles ou des comportements limites (sachant que la limite n'est plus actuellement vraiment tracée), c'est simple :

1°) Suppression de la possibilité de faire des transferts direct. Les ventes se font exclusivement par les enchères (d'au moins 12 heures), c'est comme ça que ça se passe dans beaucoup de jeux concurrents de VF.
J'entends déjà geindre ceux qui vont dire que ça ampute le jeu d'une partie du plaisir qu'ils y trouvent. Certes mais ça interdit radicale...

The game wants to be close to reality, if you remove transfers between clubs it makes no sense.
To win matches you already have to be disconnected for a management game that's not very good.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

8 dagen geleden

That's right, you're one of those who'll be moaning :) :)
But just be a bit objective and agree that it doesn't stop transfers, because there are auctions, but it does stop fraudulent or suspicious transfers, but if you want it to continue, let's not change anything.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

kiki-sainté |

8 dagen geleden

myforsans: C'est bien ça, tu fais partie de ceux qui vont gémir :) :)
Mais sois juste un peu objectif et conviens que ça ne supprime pas les transferts, puisqu'il y a les enchères, mais par contre ça supprime les transferts frauduleux ou suspicieux mais bon si tu souhaites que ça perdure, ne changeons rien.

Auctions to sell at a loss, no thank you, we've been going through this for 10 seasons now. I'm not moaning, sorry, review the definition of moaning, I think they'll appreciate it when it's your turn (humour, eh, don't moan).


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

8 dagen geleden

You wouldn't necessarily sell at a loss if it became the only way to sell. Obviously at the moment it's not a good way to sell because a lot of sales are made through fraudulent transfers, but if it becomes the only way to sell, it will also be the only way for buyers to sell.

And I wouldn't expect you to tell me that if there are more buyers at auction, the seller will be better off.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht