Hello,
In matches, we sometimes have injuries, and if we don't make any changes, we play with 10 players.
Except that if we have an injury at the start of the match and unfortunately we weren't able to attend the match, well we play the match with 10 against 11, which is annoying in big matches.
What I'm proposing is that the game automatically substitutes a player in the same position (or almost in the same position if there are no other players in that position available) who doesn't play if there's an injury. This will surely prevent some teams from losing if they have an injured player in their team during the match.
I don't think this idea has been proposed before, but if it has, I apologise.

I think that the said feature is available to those with VIP membership (who invest real money in game), so I don't see it becoming a regular feature.
But I don't think that playing with a player down has as big of an impact as it has in real life, it obviously depends on a player, but, in theory, I think it's possible to weaken a team with a sub for injured player mostly due to affinity and (possibly negative) impact on playing styles.

Andre Malles: I think that the said feature is available to those with VIP membership (who invest real money in game), so I don't see it becoming a regular feature.
But I don't think that playing with a player down has as big of an impact as it has in real life, it obviously depends on a player, but, in theory, I think it's possible to weaken a team with a sub for injured player mostly due to affinity and (possibly negative) impact on playing styles.

But if we play with only 10 players there's no many chances to win.
Once a player is down, he leaves the match, so we're not 11 but 10.

calou5: Bonjour,
En match parfois on a des blessures, et si on ne fait pas de changement, on joue à 10 joueurs.
Sauf que si on a une blessure en début de match et que malheureusement on a pas pu assister au match, eh bien on joue le match à 10 contre 11, ce qui est embêtant dans des gros matchs.
Ce que je propose c'est que le jeu fasse le remplacement automatiquement avec un joueur du même poste (ou presque du même poste si il y a pas d'autres joueurs du poste disponibles) qui ne joue pas si il y

Do you also want automatic tactical changes in case you lose? 😅

Sorry to use irony, fortunately those who follow their matches is an advantage in some circumstances.

Yes, it's absurd, but this is a MANAGEMENT game,
Play FIFA, I think it's more appropriate.

Taking carrots against afk is already a pain in the arse, so if on top of that there are automatic substitutions, there's no point in following the games...

Rull43: Tu souhaites aussi des changements automatiques tactiques au cas où tu perds? 😅

Désolé d'utiliser l'ironie, heureusement que ceux qui suivent leurs matchs est un avantage dans certaines circonstances.

Well, imagine you can't follow the match because of something serious IRL, and one of your players gets injured, well then you'll be glad there's automatic substitution.

calou5: Bah imagine que tu ne peux pas suivre le match à cause de quelque chose de grave IRL, et qu'un de tes joueurs se blesse, eh bien là tu seras bien content qu'il y ait le remplacement automatique.

I think if something bad happens to you, a virtual game is the least of your worries, isn't it? 😭😂

calou5: Bah imagine que tu ne peux pas suivre le match à cause de quelque chose de grave IRL, et qu'un de tes joueurs se blesse, eh bien là tu seras bien content qu'il y ait le remplacement automatique.

Yes, that's life. We're playing a management game. I don't manage well 😅, but others excel. You have to play another game.

Zeus: Je pense que si il t'arrives quelque chose de grave, un jeu virtuel est le dernier de tes soucis non ? 😭😂

No, but once everything's going well again, you remember the match and go and see an injured player who couldn't be replaced.

Rull43: Oui c'est la vie. On joue à un jeu de gestion. Je gère mal 😅, mais d'autres excellent. Faut jouer à un autre jeu.

In itself, his proposal is reasonable!

Against, because it will give afk an advantage, as MDm often does.

Magikcats: Contre, car ça va avantager les afk comme le MDm le fait souvent.
Et quand avant le début si tu es a 10 le jeu rajoute un joueur automatiquement car tu commences a 11

But I'm talking about during the match

calou5: Mais je parle de pendant le match

You have to be present during your match - it makes sense

calou5: Mais je parle de pendant le match

As I said against during the match. Because the MDm often favours the afk (especially in IE), it's better to leave it like that. After an injury if you're afk it's like a red. How many times have I found myself on 10 vs 11. So on the contrary, the day I injure an opposing player, I'm happy (in the game, of course).