michbou |
Hace 46hHello
I suggest that Aymeric 45 takes a step backwards regarding goalkeepers.
To change goalkeepers, the team manager must have another goalkeeper or, if he doesn't have one, he can either take one on loan or buy one, but under no circumstances should he use an outfield player as a replacement
This will prevent goalkeepers from losing their scores AND will relieve the administrators, who are called upon every time to re-establish the score.
I know some people will say that in real life it's feasible
But this is a virtual game based on real life
But Aymeric 45 is not obliged to follow real life
Go and give your opinion 😂😂😂🕷️📋🍻
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
myforsans |
Hace 31hWhat we really need to do is stop the game treating goalkeepers as "out of touch":
At the moment :
- he never gets injured (maybe once in 10,000 times in training, but never in a match)
- he never gets carded
- he tires much less than other players
- he has lower progress coefficients in training
Result =
- 95% of clubs have just one goalkeeper in their squad.
- The transfer market for goalkeepers is completely sluggish and they are worth 2 or 3 times less than an outfield player of the same age and NG,
- It's complicated to train a young keeper yourself and most clubs subcontract this training.
Another result is that some clever little buggers have found ways to take advantage of the lack of fatigue by making changes during matches, swapping positions during training sessions, etc.
Finally, the result is that some slightly inconsistent countermeasures have been put in place in the game settings to foil these loopholes.
Wouldn't the simplest solution be to simply remove all the goalkeeper's special features?
He'd get tired like his mates, he'd have the same training coefficients, etc....
And then no more stupid settings with penalties for goalkeeper/outfield player substitutions
That way, clubs will have two goalkeepers that they'll play roughly every other day, which will boost the goalkeeper transfer market and put an end to all the loopholes dreamt up by those who take advantage of the particularities of this player, who is currently 'out of the game' and who will now be aligned with the parameters of the other players.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
Marcus Aurelius |
Hace 31hIRL too, he's out of touch with the ground, if that expression can be applied to the subject.
Making it impossible to change jobs is enough to close all the loopholes.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
myforsans |
Hace 30hMarcus Aurelius: IRL aussi il est hors sol, si tenté que cette expression puisse convenir au sujet.
Rendre impossible le changement de poste suffit à fermer toutes les failles.
Well "so long" 😀
But why ban switching when it is possible in reality.
Currently it's restricted to counter loopholes.
If the goalkeeper was treated like everyone else: no more possible loopholes.
And your keeper can get injured or sent off, which isn't possible in the game at the moment but should be if the keeper was treated like the other players and you don't have a substitute keeper, well too bad for you, you have to play an outfield player and that will weaken your team.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
Marcus Aurelius |
Hace 30hIf the aim is to block vulnerabilities, blocking the machine is enough.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
kiki-sainté |
Hace 30hI'd like to add that it's possible to change goalkeepers during a match, unless you can do it now without forfeiting a match?
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
Andre Malles |
Hace 28hI've always thought that the GKs can't get injured or sent off during matches is because a team can't play without GK in real life.
If it was possible, what if the manager wasn't active when it happened? In case of injury would he be automatically replaced by first / best available GK on the bench or random outfield player on the bench if there are no GKs? Would a random outfield player become a GK in case of sending off or if there is a GK on the bench would he automatically replace one of the outfield players?
Galywat |
Hace 28hmyforsans: Ce qu'il faudrait surtout, c'est arrêter le fait que le gardien soit traité par le jeu comme un joueur "hors sol" :
Actuellement, :
- il ne se blesse jamais (peut être 1 fois sur 10 000 à l'entrainement mais jamais en match)
- il ne prend jamais de carton
- il se fatigue beaucoup moins que les autre joueurs
- il a des coefficients inférieurs de progression aux entrainements
Résultat =
- 95 % des clubs ont un seul gardien dans leur effectif.
- Le marché des transferts des gardiens est c
Looking forward to reading posts on the carrot topic with :
"impossible to score when the opposition played 80 minutes without a goalkeeper"
On a more serious note, injuries or red cards in matches would cause too many problems (inactivity, latency of the mdm).
I don't see any problem with this type of player being managed completely differently: that's also the case IRL. Just blocking the position would be enough to solve all the problems of flaws or big fingers.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
kiki-sainté |
Hace 27hOn the other hand, changing a goalkeeper due to injury means delaying the match as it takes longer for a goalkeeper
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
Sun's |
Hace 26hGalywat: Hâte de lire des posts sur le sujet carotte avec :
"impossible de marquer alors que l'adversaire a joué 80 min sans gardien de but"
Plus sérieusement, les blessures ou cartons rouge en match poseraient trop de soucis (inactivité, latence du mdm).
Je vois pas de soucis à ce que ce type de joueur ait une gestion complètement différente : c'est également le cas IRL. Juste bloquer le poste suffirait à solutionner tous les problèmes de failles, ou de gros doigts.
The problem arises mainly in federations, because in this module, if the coach doesn't connect, the game picks up an outfield player at random and puts him in goalkeeper mode
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
King |
Hace 24hmyforsans: Ce qu'il faudrait surtout, c'est arrêter le fait que le gardien soit traité par le jeu comme un joueur "hors sol" :
Actuellement, :
- il ne se blesse jamais (peut être 1 fois sur 10 000 à l'entrainement mais jamais en match)
- il ne prend jamais de carton
- il se fatigue beaucoup moins que les autre joueurs
- il a des coefficients inférieurs de progression aux entrainements
Résultat =
- 95 % des clubs ont un seul gardien dans leur effectif.
- Le marché des transferts des gardiens est c
Then we'll be complaining about goalkeeper injuries. If there are going to be changes, it's not going to be the goalkeepers. They're fine the way they are.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
myforsans |
Hace 21hIt's not complicated, you just need to have 2 goalkeepers in your squad.
The management of goalkeeper settings in this game is totally incoherent.
So obviously people have got used to it and, as is the case every time a change (even a logical one) is proposed, people panic.
How can it be consistent that a goalkeeper never gets injured, never gets carded, never progresses as quickly as the others, etc.?
And as usual, every time there are inconsistencies, the clever ones rush in to take advantage of them, and then even more inconsistent rules (or settings) are introduced to counteract them.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original