Hi, I've just done the physical preparation event. The money has been withdrawn, my players did lose 30%, but none of my players received 1 stamina point as announced in the event.

Nathalie lavernaux: Bonjour, je viens de faire l'événement de préparation physique. L'argent a été retiré, mes joueurs ont bien perdu 30 %, mais aucun de mes joueurs n'a reçu 1 point d'endurance comme annoncé dans l'événement

Hi, I see they've taken +1 in endu this week

Just in case, only players less than 56 days old won't be taking part and won't therefore receive the +1 in stamina.
The rest looks ok

Hi, I did the event and they all took +1, even those who don't have 56 days' seniority. I only have 2 players affected:
A. Rumetshofer
A. Solomou

I'll leave it up to the admins to remove the endu point and reinject 30% physics if necessary.
Thanks

Hi, I've just done the physical preparation event. The money has been withdrawn, my players did lose 30%, but none of my players received 1 stamina point as announced in the event.

micha02: Au cas ou, seul les joueurs de moins de 56 jours ne participent pas et ne recevrons donc pas le +1 en endurance.
Le reste à l'air ok

Ok, thanks for the reply, I didn't know that recent players didn't get the point.
Sorry, my apologies.

At first glance, they have all gained + 1 in stamina, except for the loan players.

Not me, I have him for example who didn't take anything: N. Mukhtarov

fablec: A première vue, ils ont tous pris + 1 en endurance sauf les joueurs en prêt

Serrieux
What kind of change is this that deprives loan players of a point? It makes no sense at all.

What crazy timing to put the event back on when the LDC starts.....

hazard14: Quel timing de fou de remettre l'événement quand la LDC commence.....

🤣🤣

Ali_Cool: Serrieux
Qu’est-ce que c’est que ce changement qui prive les joueurs prêtés d’un point ? Ça n’a aucun sens.

You obviously lack experience on this game.

Hello,

Training session this morning, all my players apart from the one I bought yesterday (L. Cheuk) have taken one endurance point, according to the progression table.

If the new rule is 56 days of seniority, then those players shouldn't have taken any:
Deleted player
S. Khotsaya
W. Zhong
S. Phomthisene
B. Xaysongkham

Well then, it's weird, but him (S. Phomthisene) I thought already had 14 endurance ... I should have taken screenshots before / after ... I'm not sure at all, ... I'm not attentive enough to this kind of detail .... I'm not much help, I know ... but I figure it could be a display bug too.
Really, it seemed to me that it already had a 14 in endurance, I say that because it's a big purchase for me, and I looked at it a bit more than the others ....
Having said that, 13 or 14 isn't much .... so it makes me doubt things ... I'm not sure of anything ...

Leguman: Bonjour,

Stage effectué ce matin, tous mes joueurs à part celui acheté hier (L. Cheuk) ont pris un point d'endurance , selon le tableau de progression.

Si la nouvelle règle c'est 56 jours d'ancienneté, alors ceux là n'auraient pas du prendre :
Deleted player
S. Khotsaya
W. Zhong
S. Phomthisene
#jo...

Normally the tab: #joueurs?view=prog is fairly reliable

Ok, so players with less than 56 days seniority have taken 1 point from me.

The rest is forgotten ^^.

Two players at -56j at my place took the point, if ever :
C. Griffiths
R. Twajamahoro

So the rule has changed? We understand nothing

Leguman: Bonjour,

Stage effectué ce matin, tous mes joueurs à part celui acheté hier (L. Cheuk) ont pris un point d'endurance , selon le tableau de progression.

Si la nouvelle règle c'est 56 jours d'ancienneté, alors ceux là n'auraient pas du prendre :
Deleted player
S. Khotsaya
W. Zhong
S. Phomthisene
#jo...

In my opinion, the players already present at the start of the new season were considered to be quite old.

IS IT POSSIBLE THAT ONLY THE PLAYERS FROM THE CLUB TAKE OVER?
AND not those on loan

michbou: EST ce que cela serait possible que seul prenne plus Un Que Les joueurs issus du club ?
ET Pas ceux En prêt où nouvellement recruté 🤔

Yes, I have two recruits who didn't take the point:
(S. Baumann)
(J. Hunsala)

Is it normal for a player who has been on loan for 59 days not to be taken on +1?

Ballounet: Est ce normal qu'un joueur prêté depuis 59 jours n'est pas pris +1 en endu?

Yes, players on loan no longer benefit from the stamina point.

It's a bit of nonsense.
They lend us players with high potential and in the end they don't take the endurance training course.
In such cases, it's better to train young players on your own. It's bad enough that the players who come out of the cdf have lost their stamina, but this is the last straw.

Ballounet: C'est un peu n'importe quoi.
On nous prête des joueurs avec des hauts potentiels et au final il prenne pas le point du stage d'endurance.
Dans ces cas là il vaut mieux faire sa formation de jeune seul. Déjà que les joueurs en sortie de cdf ont perdu de l'endurance mais là c'est le ponpon

From now on, the player is considered to be still with his owner, so when he returns to his club he will have the time spent at the club before going on loan + the 56 days that have elapsed.

Sun's: Oui , les joueurs en prêts ne bénéficient plus du point d'endurance

On the other hand, I have the impression that some players returning on loan don't benefit either, which is completely abnormal.

For example, my player Solheim
S. Solheim

It's been 5 days since he returned to my squad and he didn't score any stamina points at today's training camp (NB: I should point out that he hadn't done any training at the club where he was on loan, so we're not talking about a potential accumulation of training camps).

I have the impression that it's still buggy. But to find out, at the very least it should be written in black and white what the new rule is for physical training.

Once the rule is stated, that would make it easier to know if the settings are correct, because right now we're at a loss to understand what's going on and we're at the point of divining to try to understand if what we're seeing is really what was intended.

And as usual, we get the impression that we're the victims of the fact that two or three clever people have used a loophole for several seasons (swearing up and down after being caught red-handed that it wasn't a loophole) and then everyone else suffers in a somewhat blind and seemingly random way, judging by the number of messages saying that they don't understand what we're seeing.

In any case, the way it seems to be set up now, I'm going to stop making any loans at all if the players don't take any more stamina points while they're on loan or when they're back from loan.

So much the worse for the training clubs for whom this was an honest way of developing, they're going to be the collateral victims of those who cheated and who obviously went unpunished.

I've had a player on loan with me for 2 or 3 seasons and he hasn't taken a point. It's clearly penalising and counter-productive.
Personally, I'm all in favour of the change that's been made to loans, not being able to recall a loan. On the other hand, I don't see why there should be a double penalty. What's the point of not giving an endu point to a player on loan when the lender can't do anything about it?