giljr |

20/09/2025

Hi everyone!
Do you know why this player M. Melia had a shorter training period than expected, when he was supposed to finish at 23?

I've heard of extended maturity periods following a late exit from the CDF, but I don't know what could have caused this.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Sun's |

20/09/2025

It can happen if it's really early, which isn't really the case here.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

jamsss |

20/09/2025

Hello,
Your player hasn't finished his progression, he still has 0.388% left. It's just that this season he has a coefficient of 0 and next season he will have his progression for the remaining 0.388%.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
2 more replies
jamsss Bonjour, Ton joueur n'a pas fini sa progression il lui reste 0,388%. C'est juste que cette saison il a un coeff de 0 et la saison prochaine il aura sa progress…

giljr |

20/09/2025

Indeed lol!
So the pro season will probably be 0.1%!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Demi-cerveau |

20/09/2025

As it happens, he hasn't finished his progression. He has a very strange curve, I'll grant you that, but you'll see that next season he'll have a non-zero coefficient to reach 82.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Uzzego27 |

20/09/2025

It's happened to me once or twice, but it's quite rare - I don't know why either.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Brutus |

20/09/2025

It seems to me that Aymeric once said (I can't remember where) that players could have different maturity ranges to those displayed, and the same goes for regressions, I think!

After that, yes, it's rare... but I think you should have seen it last season when your player reached 81.xxx progression at the age of 21 ;)


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Vrael Zendo |

20/09/2025

Here is the news in question:
#forum?topic=161707


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

myforsans |

20/09/2025

In any case, there's nothing to complain about: you'll have a player with a good NG for a longer period of time!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Brutus |

20/09/2025

Yep a 21 -> 32, that's not bad ^^

It's a shame he didn't play a lot more games to improve his NG a bit.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ouattara |

20/09/2025

How many matches on average do you need to train?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Brutus |

20/09/2025

Basically, it's every other day... so 28 per season... after that, if you play 35 to 40 per season, it's just a bonus ;)


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ouattara |

20/09/2025

Ok well received


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ouattara |

20/09/2025

Ok well received


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Brutus |

20/09/2025

Received twice, it's always better than once ^^


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

giljr |

20/09/2025

Thank you all for your replies

I can see that he's a special player in the VF Store, even though he's been playing the game since he was 17. Which may explain this "anomaly".


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

|

20/09/2025

the young players on the store are not comparable with those on vf, they are not as strong and the ranges are very different too
the settings of the players on the store are not consistent with the vf players
bon jeux a toi


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message