Bjr
My 2 GACs have lost their keeper pts
Chakir H. Chakir and Termina the 22 year old GAC
It requires an intervention URGENT PLEASE

you must have played it in dlc :)

michbou: tu as du le faire jouer en dlc :)

I don't think that's a link. It's kind of weird. You can lose XP stored on a memory Goal by changing its position during the match. But you can't lose all those Guardian features.

michbou: tu as du le faire jouer en dlc :)

Even though... how many times do we do this? This is a bug, please correct it. These are 2 GACs, not 1

Quite curious to read the rest. As a reminder, playing your goalkeeper in the field is allowed. The reverse is also allowed.

This doesn't pose any optimisation problems, since a player who plays goalkeeper earns 2 times less xp than a player who plays outfield, and a player who plays goalkeeper and is replaced earns no xp.

this can happen if you want to optimise player xp by reversing player positions

michbou: cela peut arrivé si ont veux optimiser les xp de joueurs en inversant les positions de joueurs

The solution is what knowing that my 2 GACs have lost their points. Pke we do all this we have never lost points. Is there any way of getting the points back?

when the lie takes the lift, the truth takes the stairs and more time
8 months ....... so the other flaws never came up again ....

Raito: Bjr
Mes 2 GACs ont perdu leurs pts du Gardien
Chakir H. Chakir et Termina le GAC jeune de 22 ans
Ça demande une intervention URGENTE SVP

Unheard of 😅
What's more, the loss of a characteristic doesn't appear on the progress sheet of either player.
Quickly find an extra keeper, given that your incumbent is one of them, while the admins identify the source of the problem and carry out an intervention.
But it's really very strange ...

Lahi: Du jamais vu 😅
De plus la perte de caractéristique n'apparaît pas sur la fiche de progression des deux joueurs.
Trouve rapidement un gardien supplémentaire, vu que ton titulaire en fait partie, le temps que les admins identifient l'origine du problème et effectuent une intervention.
Mais c'est vraiment très étrange ...

It's fatal

As michbou said, the return of the mdj is that :
It can happen if some try to take advantage of the loophole of reversing positions in match

So it wouldn't be a bug but a fix for those taking advantage of changing positions with the goalkeeper

bluethunders26: Comme a dit michbou le retour du mdj est que :
Ça peut arriver si certains essaient de profiter de la faille des inversions de poste en match

Donc ça ne serait pas un bug mais un correctif pour ceux profitant du changement de poste avec le gardien

"What's wrong with changing positions in matches? I didn't quite catch that. Could you elaborate a bit please?
Is it considered a flaw if you play a keeper in a position other than goalkeeper, or are you not talking about that?
Finally, we all know what Michbou is saying, and it was about storing xp. But losing characteristics all at once is unheard of

bluethunders26: Comme a dit michbou le retour du mdj est que :
Ça peut arriver si certains essaient de profiter de la faille des inversions de poste en match

Donc ça ne serait pas un bug mais un correctif pour ceux profitant du changement de poste avec le gardien

Ami ... all the managers in this game do it and it's allowed so we all benefit as it's not a FAILURE and IT'S NOT ONLY ME who uses it. Besides, in irl there are GACs who play Liberos who take part in the construction of the game there are free kick takers and prenos and if you look in the history of football you will be surprised. Mtn you have left me no choice and I go straight to the inventor of the game. Thank you for your contributions administrators

Raito: Ami ... tous les managers de ce jeu le font et c est autorisé donc on profite tous vu que ce n'est pas une FAILLE et PAS MOI SEUL qui l'utilise. Par ailleurs, dans l irl y a des GACs qui jouent des Liberos qui participent à la construction du jeu y a des tireurs des coups franc et des prenos et si tu cherches dans l histoire de foot tu seras surpris. Mtn vous m avez pas laissé de choix et je passe directement à l'inventeur du jeu. Merci pour vos interventions administrateurs

Don't worry, the mdj is the inventor of the game, so Aymeric45

The feedback we give you is the feedback we receive from him

Not everyone does that!

In your match on 30 December, Termina used a loophole that has just been "corrected"

Arazosv: Sur ton match du 30 Decembre, Termina a utilisé une faille qui vient d'être ""corrigée""

Can you elaborate please
because I don't know if it's in the morning, but normally it's allowed to play in another position?

A coffee and I think I've got it.!!!!!
It is forbidden to switch from keeper to DLC during a match and the other way round for a keeper?

Exactly.
Playing an outfield player as a goalkeeper or vice versa was not outlawed, as there were advantages and disadvantages that were more or less in balance.

This loophole meant that you only had the advantages, without the disadvantages.
In other words, a goalkeeper's physical fitness was reduced, while an outfield player gained xp. So the player plays every day, even with stamina at 5.

Arazosv: Sur ton match du 30 Decembre, Termina a utilisé une faille qui vient d'être ""corrigée""

Can you explain what you mean by a flaw in the 30 December date? I've had a good look at his calendar, but I can't find anything wrong with that date. His player played 90 minutes in a position other than gac. Is that what you call a flaw? You should know that nothing has been corrected yet, because as I speak to you, I see GAC players playing in other positions. Just do a global search on goalkeepers (17-21 years old with a potential of 77 to simplify the search) in training and you'll see...

Socrate: Exacte.
Faire jouer un joueur de champs en gardien ou vice versa, ce n’était pas proscrit, car il y’avait des avantages et des inconvénients qui s’équilibraient plus ou moins.

Cette faille permettait d’avoir que les avantages, sans les inconvénients.
À savoir une baisse de physique d’un gardien et les gains en xp d’un joueur de champs. Donc le joueur joue tous les jours même avec une endurance à 5.

If this is forbidden, then it would be better to add it to the rules, because others risk having their player disowned without having intended to exploit a bankruptcy...

Lahi: Pouvez-vous expliquer ce que vous appelez faille pour la date du 30 décembre ? J’ai beau regarder son calendrier, je ne note rien d’anormal pour cette date. Son joueur a joué 90 minutes à un poste autre que gac. C’est cela que vous appelez une faille ? Sachez alors que rien n’est encore corrigé, puisque, au moment où je vous parle, je vois des gac jouer à d’autres postes. Il suffit de faire une recherche globale sur les gardiens (17-21 ans avec un potentiel de 77 pour simplifier

That's where your mistake lies, if you look at the actions and his physical losses, he was changed at the end of the match

Arazosv: Elle est là ton erreur, si tu regardes les actions et ses pertes physiques, il a été changé de poste à la fin du match pour profiter des pertes physiques d'un goal, et des gains d'un joueur

Like the player switched from gac to another position at the end of the game?

That's exactly the flaw explained above! Yes !

Arazosv: C'est exactement la faille qu'a été expliquée au dessus ! Oui !

Yesterday you sent me several mails and I was frank in replying, even though I don't even know you (you'll be happy if they block me). In any case, I'm the loser in this whole story. And NORMALLY. Updates or changes to the game should be shown in their News section.
To close this post
THANK YOU

Arazosv: C'est exactement la faille qu'a été expliquée au dessus ! Oui !

Thanks for the clarification 🙂.

Raito: Hier tu m as mp plrs fois et j étais franc en te répondant même je te connais même pas qu es tu. ( tu seras content s'ils me bloquent). En ts cas c'est moi le perdant de toute cette histoire. Et NORMALEMENT. Les MAJ ou modifications sur le jeu doivent être illustrés dans leur rubrique News.
A fermer ce post
MERCI

It's funny though, if you can see that there are benefits, you might as well find out if you're not using a loophole. Especially as, as I explained to you, you're not the first person to have done this, even if the previous time there was a change, it's still the same thing

Also, I'd like to know your reasons for thinking that I'd be happy if they blocked you?
Honestly, it affects one of me without moving the other

😁

Arazosv: Par ailleurs, j'aimerais connaitre tes raisons qui pensent à croire que je serais content s'ils te bloquent ?
Honnêtement, ça m'en touche une sans bouger l'autre

Calm down, there's no need to get confused. There's just a problem of understanding. Askip there's a member of the top 6 agreements who had his player renounced in this way not long ago, and the problem would come from there, because Aymeric made changes because of this story.
So Arazovsv, try to give us some idea of where your problem is coming from, even if we're not 100% sure that it's the root of the problem.
But if that really is the problem, then close the post to prevent things from getting out of hand.
Have a nice day!

the answers having been given concerning the losses of the guards
i'm closing this topic.
thank you