Unheard of 😅
What's more, the loss of a characteristic doesn't appear on the progress sheet of either player.
Quickly find an extra keeper, given that your incumbent is one of them, while the admins identify the source of the problem and carry out an intervention.
But it's really very strange ...

It's fatal

I don't think that's a link. It's kind of weird. You can lose XP stored on a memory Goal by changing its position during the match. But you can't lose all those Guardian features.

Even though... how many times do we do this? This is a bug, please correct it. These are 2 GACs, not 1

The solution is what knowing that my 2 GACs have lost their points. Pke we do all this we have never lost points. Is there any way of getting the points back?

"What's wrong with changing positions in matches? I didn't quite catch that. Could you elaborate a bit please?
Is it considered a flaw if you play a keeper in a position other than goalkeeper, or are you not talking about that?
Finally, we all know what Michbou is saying, and it was about storing xp. But losing characteristics all at once is unheard of

Ami ... all the managers in this game do it and it's allowed so we all benefit as it's not a FAILURE and IT'S NOT ONLY ME who uses it. Besides, in irl there are GACs who play Liberos who take part in the construction of the game there are free kick takers and prenos and if you look in the history of football you will be surprised. Mtn you have left me no choice and I go straight to the inventor of the game. Thank you for your contributions administrators

Don't worry, the mdj is the inventor of the game, so Aymeric45

The feedback we give you is the feedback we receive from him

Can you elaborate please
because I don't know if it's in the morning, but normally it's allowed to play in another position?

Can you explain what you mean by a flaw in the 30 December date? I've had a good look at his calendar, but I can't find anything wrong with that date. His player played 90 minutes in a position other than gac. Is that what you call a flaw? You should know that nothing has been corrected yet, because as I speak to you, I see GAC players playing in other positions. Just do a global search on goalkeepers (17-21 years old with a potential of 77 to simplify the search) in training and you'll see...

If this is forbidden, then it would be better to add it to the rules, because others risk having their player disowned without having intended to exploit a bankruptcy...

Yesterday you sent me several mails and I was frank in replying, even though I don't even know you (you'll be happy if they block me). In any case, I'm the loser in this whole story. And NORMALLY. Updates or changes to the game should be shown in their News section.
To close this post
THANK YOU

Thanks for the clarification 🙂.

It's funny though, if you can see that there are benefits, you might as well find out if you're not using a loophole. Especially as, as I explained to you, you're not the first person to have done this, even if the previous time there was a change, it's still the same thing

Calm down, there's no need to get confused. There's just a problem of understanding. Askip there's a member of the top 6 agreements who had his player renounced in this way not long ago, and the problem would come from there, because Aymeric made changes because of this story.
So Arazovsv, try to give us some idea of where your problem is coming from, even if we're not 100% sure that it's the root of the problem.
But if that really is the problem, then close the post to prevent things from getting out of hand.
Have a nice day!