I'll get the ball rolling, you're a fan of American sports apparently lol.
Are we the NFL and the NCAA now?

So I didn't get anything out of the way 🤣
If anyone can explain please

#entente?draft'll take a look there, it will enlighten you a little I think

The idea is very good, although reserved, unless I'm mistaken, to certain Entente who will fight internally to win a player.

From my point of view, I would have imagined that each Entente would benefit from a player who would eventually spend 1 season on loan in each club so that he could be improved and then resold at a better price with a profit paid to the training members.
Well ok with 50 members he will never have done all but to have in this case 5 trainers and 5 seasons later resale of the players and benefits distributed to all members.
Gas plant what 🤯🤯🤯 😂😂😂

Alex-AJA: Alors moi, j'ai rien pigé au truc 🤣
Si quelqu'un peut expliquer svp

Similar 😁 😁 😁

Demi-cerveau: #entente?draft va faire un tour là, ça t'éclairera un peu je pense

Dans un premier temps, le président de la menace du nord est va choisir un joueur dans cette liste pour une enchère interne à son entente. Ensuite ce sera le président de l'entente qui a fini avant dernière de D1 la saison dernière, et ainsi de suite.

Hi Demi, there's something I'm missing. It is written reserved for Division 1 agreements. The threat from the North-East is in D2. So I think like you that the last, penultimate and penultimate of last season will choose.
In this case there are 17 players for 19 picks? Or do the 3 on the D1 podium have no choice?

I think that the agreements that were in D2 last season will not choose. For me, there are 17 players for 16 deals.

and the D3 ??

Demi-cerveau: Je pense que les ententes qui étaient en D2 la saison dernière ne choisiront pas. Pour moi il y a 17 joueurs pour 16 ententes.

Ok, we'll see if that's it, it seems more coherent to me

michbou: et les d3 ??

There is no D2, D3, D4, D5.

Only the 16 D1 agreements at the end of the 135 season can choose a player.

At the end of the season 137, the D1 agreements during this season will be able to choose and so on.

What happens if a president of an agreement puts his life before picking one? I anticipate... ^^

Alex-AJA: Alors moi, j'ai rien pigé au truc 🤣
Si quelqu'un peut expliquer svp

Do you have to know the USA sport:) 😀

question??
And if we know the coach??.
have the best player?,
BE CAREFUL, THIS IS humor. :)

It's interesting, it allows small agreements to strengthen one of their clubs, but it necessarily implies inequalities. The agreements at the top of the table will have no interest in drafting since the players will not be very interesting...
Then I am personally not for the fact of bidding on a colleague of agreement .. apart from creating a feeling of frustration for one or more members of the agreement, it's quite average...

We have to discuss internally and come to an agreement I think.
Because obviously the richest is at an advantage

iMcCarthy77: C'est intéressant ça permet aux petites ententes de renforcer un de leurs clubs mais ça implique forcément des inégalités..les ententes de haut de tableau n'auront aucun intérêt à drafter puisque les joueurs seront pas très intéressants ...
Puis je suis personnellement pas pour le fait d'enchérir sur un collègue d'entente .. à part crée un sentiment de frustration pour un/des membres de l'entente c'est assez moyen ...

It can be a very nice way to bail out the agreement since the money goes to the agreement.

On this principle, I think it's good.

Aguado: Ca peut-être une très belle manière de renflouer l'entente vu que l'argent va à l'entente.

Sur ce principe, je trouve ça bien.

That's indeed a very good idea clearly

It's still really nice for clubs without an agreement... Thank you very much...

yes not a big fan of this new improvement he has other things to improve before inventing a new concept but hey if it can bring a little spice to the game.

We're going to fight to be last in D1 mtn?! Or how to devalue the Entente classification which was already not at all highlighted...
On the one hand, we reduce the potential of young people in detection, we reduce the progression of players and on the other hand, we inject monsters with 90 potential to fall from the sky... It's always one step forward and two steps back in this game, it's going to get tiresome....

Nikzer: On va se battre pour etre dernier de D1 mtn?! Ou comment dévaloriser le classement entente qui n'était déjà pas du tout mis en valeur...
D'un côté on réduit le potentiel des jeunes en détection, on réduit la progression des joueurs er de l'autre on injecte des monstres de 90 de potentiel tomber du ciel... C'est toujours un pas en avant et deux en arrière dans ce jeu ca va en devenir lassant....

To finish in D2, and not have a pick the following season? I don't think the most relevant idea.

It's still one player for about twenty or thirty members. And while there seem to be differences between the players, they all seem interesting.

Aguado: Ca peut-être une très belle manière de renflouer l'entente vu que l'argent va à l'entente.

Sur ce principe, je trouve ça bien.

Or to have a high-potential player for free for a member of his agreement.
Personally, I'm not a fan of the idea. We will strengthen the D1 teams who generally don't need it...

Galywat: Pour finir en D2, et ne pas avoir de pick la saison suivante ? Mouais pas l'idée la plus pertinente je pense.

Ca reste un joueur pour une vingtaine/trentaine de membres. Et s'il semble y avoir des différences entre les joueurs ils semblent tous intéressants.

It's a play on words to say no, we're not going to fight for 16th place but for 13th! An agreement that is relegated anyway will prefer the last place, we will have 3 agreements playing for the title and the rest preferring to be 10th than 4th! With much less stakes in IE and much more EI to the taste of friendly matches... Of course, for the moment it's one player per agreement and per season in itself, it doesn't change much, it's more the idea of rewarding bad results and devaluing the biggest intra-entente fight that bothers me! If you lose competitiveness, the game will lose its flavor

All interesting?!! We didn't look at the same list so it starts from 89 pot to end up at 69! We don't have the same definition of interesting I think!

What is good about this novelty is that the money spent remains in the agreement, so there are two positive points for the agreement: money + future good player for the selection.
For the auction. I think that the agreements will be agreed for the club that will take him without bidding.

Nikzer: Tous intéressants ?!! On a pas regardé la meme liste alors ca part de 89de pot pour finir a 69 ! On a pas la meme définition d'intéressant je crois !

Poorly viewed indeed!

iMcCarthy77: C'est intéressant ça permet aux petites ententes de renforcer un de leurs clubs mais ça implique forcément des inégalités..les ententes de haut de tableau n'auront aucun intérêt à drafter puisque les joueurs seront pas très intéressants ...
Puis je suis personnellement pas pour le fait d'enchérir sur un collègue d'entente .. à part crée un sentiment de frustration pour un/des membres de l'entente c'est assez moyen ...

This dosent concern small agreements

The idea is really nice BUT you have to be in D1 agreement. So it only concerns a minority of clubs.

MOSTAFA: Ce qui est bien dans cette nouveauté c'est que l'argent dépensée reste dans l'entente ,donc c'est deux points positifs pour l'entente : argent + futur bon joueur pour la sélection .
Pour l'enchère. Je crois que les ententes vont se mettre d'accord pour le club qui va le prendre sans enchèrir.

Yes you're right. It's really positive for the agreement.
A player for the agreement plus money :-)

Proposal:
Division 1: Player + 90 pot or between 85 and 89 pot
Division 2: player between 80 and 84 pot
Division 3: player in 75 and 79 pot

King: Proposition :
Division 1 : joueur + de 90 pot ou entre 85 et 89 pot
Division 2 : joueur entre 80 et 84 pot
Division 3 : joueur en 75 et 79 pot

Proposal that can be interesting but you should keep it under wraps and bring it out again in a few seasons.
It's hard to imagine that your proposal will be considered when the process isn't even in place yet.

Socrate: Proposition qui peux être intéressante mais tu devrais la garder sous le coude et la ressortir dans quelques saisons.
Difficile à imaginer que ta proposition serai étudié alors que le processus n’est pas même pas encore en place.

This is probably my last season, my friend;)

Well I'll reassemble it as I want 😉

Novelty without any interest

It's a little more original but in the end it won't unbalance the transfer market and allow the cartel funds to be replenished.
So only positive but it won't revolutionize much.

One regret, however, is that there are only 16 players to draft for 16 deals.
It would be better if there were 40 or 50 players with very different profiles, classic or atypical, and that each team could have one to choose from not among 16 but from among 40 or 50 and at the time of choice there was a fight to have some players rather sure of it. Because here with 16 players to choose from 16, it's not very remote-controlled in terms of the final choice.

Rather sweat to be ... ==> Rather than others 😀

I think it's nice... Afterwards, yes I understand that it doesn't please everyone but it can be modified over time with development ideas;)

King: C’est sans doute ma dernière saison l’ami ;)

Why ? 🤧

I'm crying foul always for the division 1 agreements, the others don't give a damn ah ah (to be taken in a humorous tone)

I find that it divides more than it looks.
I don't understand the purpose and really the point.
And the others out of d1 and agreement
I deleted the original message so as not to look like a complainer 😁 yet

Interesting concept that I think won't change much. Nice nod to the NBA and the NFL... However, the concept works well for closed leagues with no promotion or relegation so that new "talents" join the wrong teams. This is in order to ensure that it is not always the same teams at the top in the closed leagues over the years. (The Bulls who draft Mr. Jordan, Cleveland who draft LeBron James and change dimensions etc.)

But here, with the ups and downs I find that it's not fair for the other divisions... Here the best player will be selected by a team that will go down to D2... And the teams that go up to D1 will not have new talents...

Nicularo: Que se passe-t-il si un président d'entente met sa vie avant d'en pick un ? J'anticipe... ^^

What is happening now^^

For my part, it's good to innovate, but not a great idea here.

We are still widening a lack of equality between the clubs. Because it only exists in D1.

No interest except for 3/4 end-of-table agreements in D1.

It's a shame to make improvements that only affect a limited handful of clubs and moreover here without necessarily merit but on the contrary.

Good idea, I like it...

It's still very elitist:)

It looks like a lottery of the seniors' club.
Do we play on a line or directly the full card to win the filled net and the 8 euro voucher at the village bakery?
In the event of a tie on a quine, is it the smallest or the largest number that wins the bottle of villageoise as a consolation prize?

Once the auction is over, when are the players given to the winning clubs?