I wanted to know if someone could tell me after how many days can we recall a player we have loaned, but that we would like to repatriate? Thanks for your answers, Gus 🐯🐾

I think it's 7 days.

Yes I think so 🤔

It's 3 days

Well done. Aymeric has blocked loan returns at 32. Do you have others like that? I would limit the number of 99NG per club so that it is a little more equitable. Come on, let's cut all the 99ng to 90 to balance it out!

The worst part is that it's based on nothing. Not a single guy in the top 10 or even the top 100 benefits from something this bogus.

Thank you for your answers!

32 days 😱 ... without informing huh

Teddy: Le pire c'est que ça se base sur rien. Pas un gars du top 10 ou même top 100 ne profite d un truc aussi bidon

If precisely (lv)

Zeus: Si justement (lv)

Why do you quote the LV in parentheses??

bluethunders26: Pourquoi tu cites la LV entre parenthèses ??

Probably because the "32 out of 32" debate is about Myforsans with its 37 players.

So for a member (who corrected the matter) it's 3 agreements to target??🤔🤔🤔

Zeus: Si justement (lv)

well then you can add all the agreements :)

No, not all agreements! :D

Zeus: Non pas toutes les ententes ! :D

well put the agreements concerned in this case. This is just throwing out a name for free :)

pieutte: bha mets les ententes concernés dans ce cas.
La c'est juste balancer un nom gratos :)

No! Facts are facts!

Zeus: Non ! Les faits sont les faits ! .

well that's what I'm telling you, there are other names who said they were at 33 and you don't mention them, so the facts are the facts when you want :)

Facts, facts ..... You have some facts my dear pieutte, but you prefer to bury your head in the sand, or hide behind your little finger, it's up to you. The facts therefore are that a club, managed by Myforsans, has been contacted several times by the game administrators (more Morten in general) for a year, because he had too many players in his team. And that as a result the administration team had received complaints. On this forum, you can find traces of the time when he had 48 players under contract (38 in the team and 10 on loan from memory), for example. That was 4 months ago, so about 120 days. He had already been asked before to reduce his number of players. He was asked again this time. And so when a few days ago, Bryou contacted me to tell me that he was playing against a team that had 37 players (thinking that I was still an administrator) and that I saw that it was still Myforsans, I suggested that he make a topic on the vforum, because obviously the reminders to order from the administrators have no effect on him, and it's a shame that it has come to this. He will probably explain that these are loan returns. Before his transfers were deleted, he had still bought 3 players on August 18, 18 and 22. To buy the last one, I imagine he had to take advantage of a quintuple departure of players in the federation. Loan returns are a good excuse. So there you go, we got to this point because a team was continually playing with the limit on the number of players. This team is part of the Viking Legion, that's how it is. This does not mean in any way that the other members of this agreement were doing the same thing. Until then, there had always been a tolerance on the numbers for loan returns precisely, or for departures from the training center. On condition that it was resolved quickly. I, like others, took advantage of it to release players in the evening, who were generally sold the next day. Myforsans played much more with the limit, now this tolerance no longer exists, I am the first to regret it because I think the loans at the start of the season will decrease a lot, and that means less help from established clubs to beginners. Now, the attitude of Myforsans (and of certain members of the Viking Legion), which consists of placing themselves as victims of the situation, is frankly misplaced, to say the least. Let him come here to dare to say that he was not asked to resolve the situation in the past. He will probably prefer to explain to us that in fact having 37 players in his team, having 48 players under contract, is a constraint of which he was the victim. As if he had not wanted this situation. To my knowledge, players do not transfer themselves to sign a contract with his club. It would have been a little classier to say that he had played with the limit of the number of players provided for by the game (limit which, by the way, has no place in the rules since it is a parameterized limit of the game. Wanting to write it in the rules is like wanting to write that you should only put 11 players on the field). I hope that these factual elements will be able to enlighten your thinking.

Demi-cerveau: Les faits, les faits ..... Vous en avez des faits mon cher pieutte, mais vous préférez faire l'autruche, ou vous cacher derrière votre petit doigt, c'est selon.

Les faits donc, c'est qu'un club, dirigé par Myforsans, a été contacté plusieurs fois par les administrateurs du jeu (plutôt Morten d'ailleurs en général), depuis un an, parce qu'il avait trop de joueurs dans son équipe. Et que de ce fait l'équipe d'administration avait reçu des plaintes. Sur ce forum, tu pourras retrouver

I would like to know why I have the right to such a beautiful message? After all it is too long to blabber about myforsans. If you can ever send it to him in pm he will surely be happy.

You got the wrong subject halfway. Focus on... , it's not here 🤭😁😘

Why is a former admin showing off his knowledge to a pack that is just waiting for that, when during his term he didn't hesitate to use this famous "loophole" to get a young person out of the center? My goodness!

Demi-cerveau: Les faits, les faits ..... Vous en avez des faits mon cher pieutte, mais vous préférez faire l'autruche, ou vous cacher derrière votre petit doigt, c'est selon.

Les faits donc, c'est qu'un club, dirigé par Myforsans, a été contacté plusieurs fois par les administrateurs du jeu (plutôt Morten d'ailleurs en général), depuis un an, parce qu'il avait trop de joueurs dans son équipe. Et que de ce fait l'équipe d'administration avait reçu des plaintes. Sur ce forum, tu pourras retrouver

Why focus on the Viking Legion when there were other members of other alliances concerned, Myforsans reacted immediately and did what was necessary so there is no point in coming to rant for a long time, the subject is closed and the message has been passed.

sora02: Pourquoi un ancien admin nous étale sa science devant une meute qui n’attends que ça alors que pendant son mandat il ne s’est pas gêné pour utiliser cette fameuse « faille » pour sortir un jeune du centre?

Ma foi

I invite you to look at the development of this topic since an intervention mentioned an agreement, and following that, reflect, in view of the various reactions, those that could be described as reactions of a "pack". Something to think about.

Demi-cerveau: Je t'invite à regarder le développement de ce sujet depuis qu'une intervention a mentionné une entente, et suite à cela réfléchir, au vu des diverses réactions, celles que l'on pourrait qualifier de réactions d'une "meute".

À méditer.

Okay, very good. But then, I didn't really understand what was wrong exactly? Because I thought I saw that the one who allowed himself to give the lesson allowed himself from the height of his high-ranking position to use a "flaw" for his own interest. But maybe I misunderstood

Is that your argument? Because it's a bit inappropriate to defend Myfor by attacking Demi I think. Or maybe I didn't quite understand my faith.

Fougch: C’est ton argumentaire ça ?
Parce que c’est un peu malvenu de défendre Myfor en attaquant Demi je trouve
Ou alors je n’ai pas bien saisi ma foi

Demi a simplement exposé des faits. Il a évoqué le fait que la plupart des managers vendaient leur surplus de joueurs le lendemain, voire qq jours après.
Là le sujet c’est un manager récidiviste qui dépasse la limite et sur de longues périodes.

And saying that the LVs are mercenaries is not an attack, we can understand the anger of some, but Morten has solved the problem, let's move on.

Anyway, the oldest ones who play clean know who is who in the game...no need to have been an admin to know that.

Demi-cerveau: Les faits, les faits ..... Vous en avez des faits mon cher pieutte, mais vous préférez faire l'autruche, ou vous cacher derrière votre petit doigt, c'est selon.

Les faits donc, c'est qu'un club, dirigé par Myforsans, a été contacté plusieurs fois par les administrateurs du jeu (plutôt Morten d'ailleurs en général), depuis un an, parce qu'il avait trop de joueurs dans son équipe. Et que de ce fait l'équipe d'administration avait reçu des plaintes. Sur ce forum, tu pourras retrouver

Hello Demi, I allow myself a small answer, although I know that in your eyes in the LV there are only ass-combs, I will ask you to no longer accuse us or accuse a member of the LV of anything on the Vforum please. I will allow myself a reminder of the rules: - "Any post of plaint against someone will be sanctioned (you have administrators open in PM if you have complaints to make)." So in the future please do not quote us or quote a player of the LV otherwise we will ask for an application of the rules. Have a good day Tbar.

To raise the debate a little, and remove some doubts, It seems to me however that I have the right to quote the LV or the members of the LV as much as I wish, since nothing in the rules prohibits quoting the LV. A young member raised to the LV (it was easy) wondered why a manager raised his voice to quote the LV. I therefore limited myself to lifting the veil on facts that had occurred to allow him to raise his thoughts on the subject a little. E(n)levez me a doubt, but I don't think I complained. At most I regretted a lack of frankness that would have allowed the aforementioned club to rise a little in my opinion. Wishing you a pleasant evening and raise your glasses ... In moderation of course !!! (And don't get up too early tomorrow morning LV friends, it's the weekend!)