Ali_Cool |
Có 7 hHi vfiens
I really like this game, but I think there are a few things that could be improved.
As a cartel chairman, I find it extremely difficult to strengthen my project with strong clubs. It's become almost impossible to convince teams with more than 80 strength to join my cartel, because the majority of managers are obsessed with the idea of joining.
Roman Legion
Viking Legion
or
Chacun Sa Chope
On top of that, many members leave the game or stop playing, which makes it very difficult to build a stable long-term project.
I also think that allowing cartels to create secondary cartels is a bad idea, because it simply allows them to accumulate the strongest teams.
When you look at the competition, you see that two cartels dominate the titles, not necessarily because they are the strongest, but mainly because the competition system always gives them priority in recruiting the best clubs.
That's why I think we need to :
reduce the number of members in cartels;
prevent secondary agreements from gaining access to Divisions 1, 2 and 3;
set up a system similar to that of clubs such as the reserve team, which only participates in the lower division.
I'm saying this for the good of the game and to make the competition more balanced and fairer for everyone.
Tin nhắn này đã được dịch. (FR) Tin nhắn gốc
hazard14 |
Có 7 hI reassure you, you can remove the LV from the 3 named 😉
Good luck.
Tin nhắn này đã được dịch. (FR) Tin nhắn gốc
Marcus Aurelius |
Có 7 hgweltaz29 |
Có 7 hSo no!
Players are of course free to make their own choices, but the clubs you've mentioned are clubs that have worked hard to get to the top level!
You can't come along and want to destroy what they've built, and the image they've managed to give their clubs!
Players only want the best, so build one of the best and then you'll be saying something completely different!
Have a great evening!
Gweltaz
Tin nhắn này đã được dịch. (FR) Tin nhắn gốc
Tomasm |
Có 7 hLahi |
Có 6 hAli_Cool: Salut les vfiens
J’aime beaucoup ce jeu, mais je pense qu’il y a plusieurs choses à améliorer.
En tant que président d’entente, j’ai énormément de difficultés à renforcer mon projet avec des clubs puissants. Il est devenu presque impossible de convaincre des équipes de plus de 80 de force de rejoindre mon entente, car la majorité des managers sont obsédés par l’idée de rejoindre
Legion Romain
Legion viking
ou
Chacun Sa ChopeEn plus de cela, beaucoup de membres quittent le jeu ou arrête...
Strangely for me, that's what makes the game so charming...
Yes, there are 2-3 deals that stand out, dominate everything, and it's normal that they attract managers who want to win a title.
It's like in the IRL (as you often like to use the IRL example 😄). You see clubs like Real, Barça and Bayern (to name but a few) attract the best players, because they're the best clubs. And to keep up with them, other clubs like PSG, with the arrival of the Qataris of course 😉 have set up a solid long-term project to catch up...
I'm talking about the long term, because that's the key. When you're having trouble attracting staff, you have to work at the grassroots level. Work with the managers who are available (often a small core group). Work on the basics without rushing. And over the long term, the agreement grows and ends up attracting people.
Let me give you an example of our agreement. We had trouble recruiting, for many reasons... some real, some invented... We were under a bit of a "blockade", if I can put it that way. So we decided: "Let's not rely on new recruits, let's rely on what we've got. Let's train our beginners. Let's set up a project that will bear fruit in the long term".
Today, some of our members have become major managers, without ever leaving the agreement. And yet, at the start, they were small, new clubs, sometimes old but with no 'experience'. But we took care to guide them and support them. We told them: "By December 2025, we want you to be ready to help us. We even called this project "12/25", with a clearly defined plan...
I'm not saying it works every time. But this kind of thing can help you to grow, to play the leading roles, and then to start attracting.
For me, it's perfectly natural. The domination of these agreements is the fruit of their hard work, their policy, their organisation and their discipline. You can't ask for changes all the time just because some people are dominant. They dominate through their work and nothing else.
Good luck with your project 👍🏻
Tin nhắn này đã được dịch. (FR) Tin nhắn gốc
Ancelloti |
Có 6 hAli_Cool: Salut les vfiens
J’aime beaucoup ce jeu, mais je pense qu’il y a plusieurs choses à améliorer.
En tant que président d’entente, j’ai énormément de difficultés à renforcer mon projet avec des clubs puissants. Il est devenu presque impossible de convaincre des équipes de plus de 80 de force de rejoindre mon entente, car la majorité des managers sont obsédés par l’idée de rejoindre
Legion Romain
Legion viking
ou
Chacun Sa ChopeEn plus de cela, beaucoup de membres quittent le jeu ou arrête...
It's not in 2 months that you'll be able to convince your 80 friends to join your agreement. When you launch an agreement project on this game, you really need to get your neurons firing to manage it and be patient.
Tin nhắn này đã được dịch. (FR) Tin nhắn gốc
Rull43 |
Có 6 hI feel sorry for you, especially as I don't think many people will join your agreement, and not because they want to join the CP or the LR.
I'll leave it to you, maybe you'll find the answer. If I tell you, I'll get a fine.
Secondly, some agreements prefer to die with their mouths open because they have the weight of their history rather than create a new project or merge. Some associations in this game are 80 or 100 seasons old, and they're vegetating in D3, and it's not the fault of the ones you mention.
The CP had to watch other BV, LR, LV etc dominate before getting there. It didn't just happen.
LR is the only team that has managed to dominate over the long term. Well done to them.
Another thing is that people prefer to create alliances when it's already hard to beat CP or LR, or when there are less than 3000 active members and half of them don't want to play in an alliance.
So instead of creating a new thing that doesn't stand up, join another more solid project, that seems logical to me. You scatter your forces and then come crying.
Then it's still possible to create something, see the L7C project. We'll have to see over time, but apparently it's possible, but it's a project that's been prepared at length and thought through, and it's attracting people little by little. But it's a union of long-standing managers who have talked to each other and come to an agreement instead of launching it alone or with two people and recruiting level 1s.
Then there's RTG who managed to convince 10 SV to join at once, so it's possible.
It's been 140 seasons since the duel agreements have existed in this way. It's not up to the best to become less good, it's up to the least good to become better.
Tin nhắn này đã được dịch. (FR) Tin nhắn gốc
Arsène |
Có 6 h"that there are less than 3,000 active players, half of whom don't want to play in an agreement".
Maybe make it compulsory for every manager to join an agreement, even if it means not playing a match at the start. That would already be more user-friendly and could be interesting later on.
Compulsory to join a league too.
It seems so logical, but hey :)
Tin nhắn này đã được dịch. (FR) Tin nhắn gốc
kiki-sainté |
Có 5 hI've come to my senses and I've been president for 14 seasons now, but a long time ago I was also president of 5 dx family agreements with 30 members.
If you can't find members, all you have to do is help the younger levels to build up with advice and certainly not money.
The nwo is 14 seasons old, we were maintained in d2 for the first time last season, and we're gradually moving up the level. some friends joined me along the way, and some I didn't even know.
I put together the no agreements in my league and my agreement grew like that.
The role of president is to be present for your members. help them a max good courage me the lr the chope the lv I would add the fyms the afus and the rtg they are the high levels of the agreements and if one day I arrive at this level I will have quite simply succeeded my agreement but it is useless to jealous them they put time before being at this level quite simply forced and work
Tin nhắn này đã được dịch. (FR) Tin nhắn gốc
passion |
Có 4 hIn my opinion, if you don't manage to bring your project to fruition, it's because you're paying too much VAT. You absolutely must take advantage of tax exemption.
😜😅
Tin nhắn này đã được dịch. (FR) Tin nhắn gốc
Radio |
Có 2 hAli_Cool: Salut les vfiens
J’aime beaucoup ce jeu, mais je pense qu’il y a plusieurs choses à améliorer.
En tant que président d’entente, j’ai énormément de difficultés à renforcer mon projet avec des clubs puissants. Il est devenu presque impossible de convaincre des équipes de plus de 80 de force de rejoindre mon entente, car la majorité des managers sont obsédés par l’idée de rejoindre
Legion Romain
Legion viking
ou
Chacun Sa ChopeEn plus de cela, beaucoup de membres quittent le jeu ou arrête...
Ali, I've been following your peregrinations for some time now and I've always noticed the same thing: you're trying to put the cart before the horse.
I think you find it hard to commit yourself to a long-term project because that would force you to be patient, and I don't think, in my humble opinion, that you're made of iron.
Good luck nonetheless, and don't forget that Rome (and its legion) wasn't built in a day.
Tin nhắn này đã được dịch. (FR) Tin nhắn gốc