Hello,
Is it or is it not allowed to play with 5 players on the forward line?

If it is allowed, is it possible to fix the bug that prevents 5 players from lining up?
If it's not allowed, is it possible to block the change of position when there are already 4 attackers, which allows the number to be increased to 5? Or what should the admins do about this flaw?

I'll find out more :)

You put 1 atc or asc mdc, put it in the 11 and put it back in its attacking position.
On the other hand, it's atd/atg/2 atc max, so you need asc or acd/asg.

lens59: Tu mets 1 atc ou asc mdc tu le rentre dans le 11 et tu remet à son poste attaque.
Par contre c'est atd/atg/2 atc max donc il faut asc ou asd/asg

It seems to me that 3 atc plus one on each side is feasible.

Lebaygue: Il me semble que 3 atc plus un de chaque côté est faisable.

Confirmed

lens59: Confirmé

As explained it is a player returned other than attack the 5th and after modification of position it passes.

Yes, that's the crux of the problem.

Either it's authorised and it's a bug that needs fixing.
Or it's not, and so there's a loophole because it can be done. That's the point of my question.

I asked the question some time ago, and the answer was open to interpretation.

lens59: Confirmé

Trapeze or triangle formation 📐 ?

@michbou, do you have any news?

Hello
Alas 🥺 no

It looks like an attacking triangle

michbou: Bonjour
Hélas 🥺 non

No what not allowed?

lens59: Non quoi pas autorisé ?

No news of my internal request

Ok

Yes, I asked that question and I'd really like to know too.

If you block the 5 attacking players, you have to block the 5 defenders or the 5 midfielders.

Frankly, I don't see the problem with 5 defenders or 5 strikers, given that we can have 5 midfielders. Personally, I play with 3 5 2, and sometimes during a match, especially at the end, I play with 5 strikers or 5 defenders.

Debate closed. The MDJ blocked the possibility of playing with 5 strikers.
In short, you score and then switch to a 5-5-0 formation by squeezing your buttocks together, and logically, you're through.
Some great matches ahead.
You'll still have to explain to me why 5 defenders is a yes, 5 midfielders is a yes, 0 strikers is a yes too. But 5 strikers is a no....

It doesn't really matter. Well, no, we can debate it if we like.

but at least the desired impossibility is blocked.

Ridiculous. The game has just regressed. In addition to everything we're seeing at the moment, it's hard to be enthusiastic about the future. Viruafoot is supposed to be entertaining through its game play, not through verbal jousting to settle disputes that 90% of players don't care about.

I think that it was a bug as you could only have 5 forwards by changing position of one midfielder or defender and if you had 5 forwards you couldn't replace 1 forward with another forward (even in the exact same position), but I'm not sure that I fully agree with the "fix", i.e. I'm not the fan of this restrictions (even though I've never played with 5 forwards, except for some friendlies last season because of the affinity).

You have to leave room for flexibility! That's what makes the game interesting! The same goes for marking. I didn't use it, but it was a challenge.

4 years of vf 4 years of being able to do it without really using it

Tazz26: Ridicule. Le jeu vient de régresser. En plus de tout ce qu'on voit en ce moment, difficile d'être enthousiaste pour l'avenir. Viruafoot est censé être divertissant de par son game play et non pas part les joutes verbales pour régler des querelles dont 90% des joueurs se moquent.

What bothers me is the unannounced changes over the last few seasons.
Without a manager, the game no longer exists and there has been minimal communication about future changes.
I can still remember youth programmes from 11 to 20 and boom disappear.
As a result, my youngsters are no longer interested.
I'm seriously starting to get bored without my agreement I would have moved on 1 year ago.

lens59: Moi se qui me dérange c'est les changements sans prévenir depuis quelques saisons .
Sans manager le jeu n'existe plus un minimum de communication sur des futurs changements.
J'ai encore en travers le passe des programmes jeunes de 11 a 20 et boum disparition .
Resultat tout vendu mes jeunes plus envie.
Je commence sérieusement à me lassé sans mon entente je serais passer à autre chose depuis 1 an

To be able to report a news item (change or creation), administrators would have to be notified 😁

I know, but I'm going to change that in New le boss précisé.
The 99% discovered and personally I do not find very respectful towards the community of this game.
But that's just my opinion.

5 attackers are forbidden, ok, but 5 pure attackers (ATG-ATC-ATG). However, you can have a mix of 5 attackers and support attackers?

wildzap: 5 attaquants sont interdits, ok, mais 5 attaquants purs (ATG-ATC-ATG). Cependant on peut avoir un mix de 5 attaquants et attaquants de soutien?

Well, I think it's clear that 5 atc or 5asc are the same thing.
if you need 5 atc to score then there's a problem with your tactics

Zeus: Bah je crois que c'est clair non 5 atc ou 5asc c'est pareil
si tu as besoin de 5 atc pour marquer c'est qu'il y un soucis dans ta tactique

You might have needed it for your last game ^^.

That was just for information. I don't see anything shocking in seeing a system with 2 or 3 top strikers and 2 or 3 support strikers across the whole width of the pitch to try and score when there's nothing left but to go for it. Personally, if I use 3 strikers, that's the maximum, but I don't find that absurd, and what's more, the ascenders still have a slight impact on the midfield.

you know, as long as it's not written in the "official" rules, the main thing is to win (not in my case) :p

wildzap: 5 attaquants sont interdits, ok, mais 5 attaquants purs (ATG-ATC-ATG). Cependant on peut avoir un mix de 5 attaquants et attaquants de soutien?

I tried and found it impossible to place 2 forwards + 3 asg asc asd support at home.

junior: Tu en aurais peut être eu besoin pour ton dernier match ^^

No, it wouldn't have made any difference, a carrot is still a carrot.

To grate or not to grate 🙉🙊🙈

wildzap: 5 attaquants sont interdits, ok, mais 5 attaquants purs (ATG-ATC-ATG). Cependant on peut avoir un mix de 5 attaquants et attaquants de soutien?

No, it's regarding any attackers (SA or AT), basically you can put any combination of SAs and ATs (except two on the same side in the same position) as long as there are no more than 4.