I would like to know if an agreement (of which only 1 member is treasurer, director, selector etc...) can not respect its commitments; in particular on what it posts on the agreement wall (bonus rules ie etc...)?
I think that there is a fairly substantial abuse of the LPA agreement and that the sole manager takes newcomers for granted and disgusts them from the game...
If anyone knows please let me know and I'll let an admin know if it's punishable!
Thanks a lot!

You're not the first person to complain about this agreement, I assure you, but the admins have nothing to reproach him for, he just has 3 or 4 agreements that only he manages.
But apparently it's his cousins
One of my members comes from this agreement and it's more than strange what he's doing, but not giving out the bonuses is shameful.
If you want to evolve at your own pace in an agreement with help, you are welcome to nwo new world order

The d'énonciations have nothing to do on the forum.
Contact the admins by mp.

Please note that no claims are accepted on the vforum.

PaulEmile: Je voudrais savoir si une entente (dont 1 seul membre est tresorier, directeur, selectionneur etc...) peut ne pas respecter ses engagements; nottament sur ce qu'il affiche sur le mur d'entente (reglement de primes ie etc...)?
Je pense qu'il y a un abus assez conséquent pour l'entente LPA et que l'unique gérant prend les nouveaux arrivant pour des billes et les dégoute du jeu...
si qqun sait svp, que je fasse remonter a un admin si c'est punissable!
Merci!

KVF in division 2 is still recruiting.
You can apply, the atmosphere is good and friendly 😜

Basically, you're asking if there's a rule governing inter-agreement agreements? Who better than an admin to answer you... On the other hand, as far as I know, there's nothing established on the subject ... Your post might have been better placed in the "improvement project" section.
If it's true that the guy disgusts newcomers, it's still a pain, given that the number of players on vf is tending to fall... So, what can I say? Too bad?

The management of agreements is entirely at the discretion of the president and his treasurer, selector and moderator.
The administrators do not and will not intervene in intra-agreement disputes.

Has your agreement failed you? Take note for next season and find one that will be more honest.
With attitudes like that, the agreement is shooting itself in the foot, that's all.

Blagoje Vidinic: La gestion des ententes est à l'entière discrétion du président et de ses trésorier, sélectionneur, animateur.
Les administrateurs n'interviennent pas et n'interviendront pas dans les conflits intra-entente.

Ton entente t'a floué ? Prends-en acte pour la saison prochaine et trouves-en une qui sera plus honnête.
Avec de telles attitudes, l'entente se tire une balle dans le pied, c'est tout.

However, at the time an admin intervened following a complaint from the chairman about me

Arazosv: Pourtant, à l'époque un admin est intervenu suite à une plainte du président à mon sujet

...do not intervene (present) and will not intervene (future)...

Blagoje Vidinic: ...n'interviennent pas (présent) et n'interviendront pas (futur)...

So a treasurer can empty the accounts without worrying 😂😂😂

Absolutely, but for whose benefit?
The treasurer can't pay himself any money.

the 2 presidents of the LPAs have been blocked because I see that they have not been active since 10pm each funny coincidence and I have the president of entente 1 in my championship in div 3 who is playing for the title with me so that's why I'm asking?

Blagoje Vidinic: Absolument mais au profit de qui ?
Le trésorier ne peut pas se verser d'argent.

With a cousin or a son it's possible apparently 😁😁😁
You created an agreement not to manage everything and to have strange allies all the same.
Then, as you say, by acting like that he's shooting himself in the foot

A solution requiring double agreement for the payment of funds,📋