Hello everyone!

Given that the improvement projects are ranked according to the number of people voting FOR them, it would be nice to have the opportunity to vote AGAINST them and also to withdraw your vote if you change your mind.

This way, the improvement projects will better reflect the basic rules of voting.

So what do you think?

I'm AGAINST it.

All it would take is a message like this one placed just below the project that people would 'like'.
We'd then be able to make a simple subtraction.

The dislike button has been withdrawn from many so-called social networks because, sociologically speaking, it was more conducive to confrontation and online harassment than to dialogue and argument.

🙄

Leguman: Je suis CONTRE.

Voilà, il suffirait d'un message comme celui-ci placé juste en dessous du projet que les gens "likeraient".
On serait alors capable de faire une simple soustraction.

Le bouton dislike a été retiré de nombreux réseaux dits sociaux car sociologiquement, il invitait plus à l'affrontement, au harcèlement en ligne qu'au dialogue et à l'argumentation.

In this case, you should be able to withdraw your like if you have been convinced by the opposing arguments.
This is not possible here 🙂

Magpie: Dans ce cas, il faut pouvoir retirer son like si on a été convaincu par les arguments inverse.
Ce n'est pas possible ici 🙂

Why not simply wait if you're undecided?
The dictatorship of the immediate imposed on us by the internet is not inextricable.

Fundamentally, I wouldn't be against "removing your like", but I do see a flaw in it.
I would compare it to the way the "edit" function has been modified.

Let's say a project reaches 100 likes.
The MDJ implements the improvement, but the way it's done or the improvement implemented isn't what was imagined ....
Likes are withdrawn en masse out of disappointment ... and it's easy to imagine a smear campaign along the lines of "the MDJ, he's killing the game, he doesn't understand anything, he's implemented something voted for by 20 likes."
So, yes, we'd have to defend ourselves with dated screenshots... especially as we're entering an era where people are falsifying IRL receipts with AI to inflate their expenses, so the legitimacy of screenshots is a little questionable... but that's just my opinion.

Leguman: Je suis CONTRE.

Voilà, il suffirait d'un message comme celui-ci placé juste en dessous du projet que les gens "likeraient".
On serait alors capable de faire une simple soustraction.

Le bouton dislike a été retiré de nombreux réseaux dits sociaux car sociologiquement, il invitait plus à l'affrontement, au harcèlement en ligne qu'au dialogue et à l'argumentation.

🤦

Leguman: Pourquoi ne pas tout simplement attendre si on est indécis ?
La dictature de l'immédiat que nous impose internet n'est pas inextricable.

Fondamentalement, je ne serai pas contre "enlever son like", mais j'y vois un défaut.
Je le comparerai à la façon de la fonction a été "éditer" a été modifiée.

Admettons un projet atteint 100 likes.
Le MDJ met en place l'amélioration, mais la façon de faire ou l'amélioration mise en place n'étant pas celle que l'on s'imaginait ....
Des likes so

Ah you're absolutely right.
Now, the VF Community is what it is 🙂
You're getting philosophical, and I agree. But... that's how it is.
Many people read a post and agree with it on the spot.
The counter-arguments are probably not read.
As a result, we can philosophise about the relevance or otherwise of the action. But you look hot, I love it 🙂

Similar projects :

• thumb down addition: #?_lang=fr#forum?topic=165522
• survey module: #?_lang=fr#forum?topic=165612

A very good initiative from our colleague

I'm all for it.

Leguman: Par contre, à mon humble avis, il est vrai que cette section "projet d'amélioration" connait une légère tendance à la dérive.
Comme pas mal de section du VForum d'ailleurs (je pense à la partie bug), mais ceci est un autre débat, elle tourne assez facilement à la discussion comme "le jeu et sa communauté" et "discussion libre" qui devraient être les seules espaces de discussions "bruts".

Il y a également trop de projets redondants, trop de projets qui n'intéressent que le cas de ce

There were more modos/admins because there were a lot more people and therefore a lot more things to keep track of, check, do, monitor and so on. The comm has melted away since then, to the point where I'm not sure there's any need to expand the team. But only they can say that and express this potential need.

I really think this is an interesting idea. Nice proposal