micha02 |
12 dagen geledenHello, idea proposed by Pika from L7C, I'm writing for him because I've run out of time.
At the moment, to move a player from agreement 1 to agreement 2, he has to be reintroduced from the first agreement, which complicates management.
I'm proposing the introduction of a feature that would allow :
- directly transfer a player from one agreement to another (e.g. Agreement 1 → Agreement 2)
- Via a dedicated button accessible from the club or player file
- With a selection of the agreements concerned (origin and destination)
- And, above all, mandatory validation by the club concerned (agreement of the manager)
Advantages:
- Avoids unnecessary deletions
- Saves time for managers
- Better traceability of movements
- More consistent with the way clubs actually operate
Thank you all for reading.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
bluethunders26 |
12 dagen geledenHello ,
Interesting idea and well presented or a question comes to me in this system.
What happens if the manager refuses to validate the move? He gets sacked to apply in the other agreement at the risk of applying in another because he didn't want to validate?
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
myforsans |
12 dagen geledenAnd what would happen to the points earned by the club if it played IE matches?
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
micha02 |
12 dagen geledenWell, the aim is to make this move with the agreement of the manager in question; if he refuses, it may be that he wants to go elsewhere and will therefore be released.
It's really a question, as we're currently doing, of moving clubs from 1 to 2 without having to sack them, but just switching them using this button, or ticking agreement 1 to 2.
I hope I've answered your question.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
Magik'jojo |
12 dagen geledenmyforsans: Et aussi comment ça se passerait avec les points acquis par le club si il a joué des matchs IE ?
In my opinion, it wouldn't change anything in the current system.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
micha02 |
12 dagen geledenmyforsans: Et aussi comment ça se passerait avec les points acquis par le club si il a joué des matchs IE ?
I don't think this system should be changed, this feature will be mainly for clubs that don't play IE, (so going from 1 to 2 at any time) and J1 for those who have played IE as is the case today.
This system will really be for going from 1 to 2 or 2 to 3, but without any IE played or J1.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
kiki-sainté |
12 dagen geledenGood idea movement possible only at the beginning of the season for example 10 days the time of acceptance because the loss of points it is embarrassing except if you do not play the classification.
At nwo we don't have a 2 at the moment but it's an idea, frankly.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
micha02 |
12 dagen geledenYes, you can send only the clubs that haven't played IE, and the other J1s without any worries ✌️
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
Nims57 |
12 dagen geledenYes, and "transfers" between 1 and 2 could be "blocked" as soon as a club has played an IE until the following season.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
Rull43 |
11 dagen geledenYou'd need a button to disolute a club, a manager, an agreement or a pieutte.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
micha02 |
10 dagen geledenYes, we just need a transfer button to save time
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
Bryanhrp22 |
5 dagen geledenTransferring funds from agreement 1 to 2 will also be good.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
lorenzo861 |
5 dagen geledenThe idea is excellent. And in case of ie played this possibility would not be executable. Neither more nor less. It would be up to the President to "fire" in that case. That would make a lot of things easier.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
estac |
5 dagen geledenBryanhrp22: Aussi pour transférer des fond de l’entente 1 à 2 ça sera bien
It's already possible
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
micha02 |
5 dagen geledenThank you for your message, Lorenzo, and thank you, Estac, for the photo.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
bluethunders26 |
5 dagen geledenestac:
I'm not sure it will work if 2 wants to send to 1.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
Brutus |
5 dagen geledenI didn't know about this feature!
Then it remains to be seen whether a president of entente 2 has the same "button" for transferring to 1?
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
micha02 |
5 dagen geledenGood precision, but in general it's more from 1 to 2.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
estac |
5 dagen geledenbluethunders26: Je suis pas sûr que ça fonctionne si la 2 veux envoyer vers la 1
I've just checked with Clamsii and Alex. They don't have the tab to transfer from 2 to 1.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
bluethunders26 |
5 dagen geledenestac: Je viens de voir avec Clamsii et Alex. Ils n'ont pas l'onglet pour faire le transfert de la 2 vers la 1
Thank you for your confirmation
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
Skyred |
5 dagen geledenSurprisingly, it's the other way round: you can send from 2 to 1, but in 1 you don't have the .... button.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
Bryanhrp22 |
4 dagen geledenKirikou |
4 dagen geledenSkyred: Étonnant nous c'est l'inverse on peut envoyer de la 2 vers la 1. Mais en 1 on a pas le bouton....
Because your agreement 2 is registered as agreement 1 and the other as agreement 2.
As far as I remember, an administrator can change this.
Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht
