Neat |
C'è 28 hIn fact, if I choose "provoke" for my player's technique, his score will go up to 96.8 or will there be no change at all?
image](https://i.imgur.com/VxPcdaa.jpeg)
Questo messaggio è stato tradotto. (FR) Messaggio originale
Fougch |
C'è 26 hNo, that means you need 36 points in passes to optimise your score in this set piece. If you choose this instruction, you'll have a collective penalty in the "short passes" collective instruction. You can see what happens when you do this, and you'll see the penalty displayed opposite your player.
Questo messaggio è stato tradotto. (FR) Messaggio originale
Leguman |
C'è 25 hHello Neat,
First of all, if you don't mind me saying so, this kind of question is more suited to the "house of the apprentice".
Your player is trained for the individual instruction "defend". (He's also missing a few points in defence for a perfect distribution).
As Fougch points out, the +36 pass, the +37 technique etc... that's what he lacks in training in the characteristic to be able to apply this individual instruction to him.
If you want to know everything about the distribution of technical and physical characteristics, depending on the individual instructions and the position, you can read this tutorial: #forum?topic=169686
Questo messaggio è stato tradotto. (FR) Messaggio originale
Neat |
C'è 18 hLeguman: Bonjour Neat,
Tout d'abord, si je peux me permettre, ce genre de question a plus sa place, dans la "maison de l'apprenti".
Ton joueur est entrainé pour la consigne individuelle "défendre". (il lui manque d'ailleurs quelques points en défense pour une répartition parfaite)
Comme le souligne Fougch, le +36 passe, le +37 technique .. etc ... c'est ce qui lui manque en entrainement dans la caractéristique pour pouvoir lui appliquer cette consigne individuelle.
Si tu veux tout savoir sur la ré...
Hello, I read the rules at the beginning, but I can't remember everything because there's so much information. Thank you for explaining them to me, I think it's easier to ask than to have to read everything again...
Questo messaggio è stato tradotto. (FR) Messaggio originale