Ballounet |
25 giorni faHello .
Looking at the instructions for my players, I noticed that there was a note and a small line underneath adding points.
Which instruction is the most interesting for this player?
Questo messaggio è stato tradotto. (FR) Messaggio originale
Blagoje Vidinic |
25 giorni faThese are the points that the player lacks in the characteristic mentioned to have an optimal NG for the set point in question.
Questo messaggio è stato tradotto. (FR) Messaggio originale
Pauul76 |
25 giorni faHow are you?
The line below simply tells you which characteristic you need to improve in order to play optimally in this set-up. In this player's case, I can see that he has a surplus in passing, so I'd opt to play in the normal set-up (because optimal score = 84.7) and short passing style of play so that he can benefit from a bonus!
Questo messaggio è stato tradotto. (FR) Messaggio originale
Ballounet |
25 giorni faBlagoje Vidinic: Il s'agit des points qui manquent au joueur dans la caractéristique mentionnée pour avoir une NG optimale pour la consigne en question.
La consigne la mieux adaptée est toujours celle qui a la meilleure NG, ici : "normal"
Mais la NG n'est pas la seule option pour exploiter au mieux les caractéristiques d'un joueur. 😉
Thanks for the answers.
I'm sure there are other options for exploiting a player's characteristics. That's exactly what I'm trying to understand.
But it's not necessarily easy.
Questo messaggio è stato tradotto. (FR) Messaggio originale
Brutus |
25 giorni faFor example, the player you give as an example has 84.7 in NG for the MOC position in normal.
But if you play your team with a short passing style.
He'll have 84.7 + about 7... so 91.7 overall.
But you don't want the rest of your team to be in deficit if you play short passes!
It's all a bit of a calculation ;)
Questo messaggio è stato tradotto. (FR) Messaggio originale