micha02 |
Hace 47 díasHello, idea proposed by Pika from L7C, I'm writing for him because I've run out of time.
At the moment, to move a player from agreement 1 to agreement 2, he has to be reintroduced from the first agreement, which complicates management.
I'm proposing the introduction of a feature that would allow :
- directly transfer a player from one agreement to another (e.g. Agreement 1 → Agreement 2)
- Via a dedicated button accessible from the club or player file
- With a selection of the agreements concerned (origin and destination)
- And, above all, mandatory validation by the club concerned (agreement of the manager)
Advantages:
- Avoids unnecessary deletions
- Saves time for managers
- Better traceability of movements
- More consistent with the way clubs actually operate
Thank you all for reading.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
bluethunders26 |
Hace 47 díasHello ,
Interesting idea and well presented or a question comes to me in this system.
What happens if the manager refuses to validate the move? He gets sacked to apply in the other agreement at the risk of applying in another because he didn't want to validate?
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
myforsans |
Hace 47 díasAnd what would happen to the points earned by the club if it played IE matches?
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
micha02 |
Hace 47 díasWell, the aim is to make this move with the agreement of the manager in question; if he refuses, it may be that he wants to go elsewhere and will therefore be released.
It's really a question, as we're currently doing, of moving clubs from 1 to 2 without having to sack them, but just switching them using this button, or ticking agreement 1 to 2.
I hope I've answered your question.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
Magik'jojo |
Hace 47 díasmyforsans: Et aussi comment ça se passerait avec les points acquis par le club si il a joué des matchs IE ?
In my opinion, it wouldn't change anything in the current system.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
micha02 |
Hace 47 díasmyforsans: Et aussi comment ça se passerait avec les points acquis par le club si il a joué des matchs IE ?
I don't think this system should be changed, this feature will be mainly for clubs that don't play IE, (so going from 1 to 2 at any time) and J1 for those who have played IE as is the case today.
This system will really be for going from 1 to 2 or 2 to 3, but without any IE played or J1.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
kiki-sainté |
Hace 47 díasGood idea movement possible only at the beginning of the season for example 10 days the time of acceptance because the loss of points it is embarrassing except if you do not play the classification.
At nwo we don't have a 2 at the moment but it's an idea, frankly.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
micha02 |
Hace 47 díasYes, you can send only the clubs that haven't played IE, and the other J1s without any worries ✌️
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
Nims57 |
Hace 47 díasYes, and "transfers" between 1 and 2 could be "blocked" as soon as a club has played an IE until the following season.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
Rull43 |
Hace 47 díasYou'd need a button to disolute a club, a manager, an agreement or a pieutte.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
micha02 |
Hace 45 díasYes, we just need a transfer button to save time
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
Bryanhrp22 |
Hace 41 díasTransferring funds from agreement 1 to 2 will also be good.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
lorenzo861 |
Hace 40 díasThe idea is excellent. And in case of ie played this possibility would not be executable. Neither more nor less. It would be up to the President to "fire" in that case. That would make a lot of things easier.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
estac |
Hace 40 díasBryanhrp22: Aussi pour transférer des fond de l’entente 1 à 2 ça sera bien
It's already possible
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
micha02 |
Hace 40 díasThank you for your message, Lorenzo, and thank you, Estac, for the photo.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
bluethunders26 |
Hace 40 díasestac:
I'm not sure it will work if 2 wants to send to 1.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
Brutus |
Hace 40 díasI didn't know about this feature!
Then it remains to be seen whether a president of entente 2 has the same "button" for transferring to 1?
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
micha02 |
Hace 40 díasGood precision, but in general it's more from 1 to 2.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
estac |
Hace 40 díasbluethunders26: Je suis pas sûr que ça fonctionne si la 2 veux envoyer vers la 1
I've just checked with Clamsii and Alex. They don't have the tab to transfer from 2 to 1.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
bluethunders26 |
Hace 40 díasestac: Je viens de voir avec Clamsii et Alex. Ils n'ont pas l'onglet pour faire le transfert de la 2 vers la 1
Thank you for your confirmation
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
Skyred |
Hace 40 díasSurprisingly, it's the other way round: you can send from 2 to 1, but in 1 you don't have the .... button.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
Bryanhrp22 |
Hace 40 díasKirikou |
Hace 39 díasSkyred: Étonnant nous c'est l'inverse on peut envoyer de la 2 vers la 1. Mais en 1 on a pas le bouton....
Because your agreement 2 is registered as agreement 1 and the other as agreement 2.
As far as I remember, an administrator can change this.
Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original
