Pierabou |

Hace 40h

Hello,
Is it or is it not allowed to play with 5 players on the forward line?

If it is allowed, is it possible to fix the bug that prevents 5 players from lining up?
If it's not allowed, is it possible to block the change of position when there are already 4 attackers, which allows the number to be increased to 5? Or what should the admins do about this flaw?


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

michbou |

Hace 40h

I'll find out more :)


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

lens59 |

Hace 36h

You put 1 atc or asc mdc, put it in the 11 and put it back in its attacking position.
On the other hand, it's atd/atg/2 atc max, so you need asc or acd/asg.


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

Lebaygue |

Hace 35h

lens59: Tu mets 1 atc ou asc mdc tu le rentre dans le 11 et tu remet à son poste attaque.
Par contre c'est atd/atg/2 atc max donc il faut asc ou asd/asg

It seems to me that 3 atc plus one on each side is feasible.


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

lens59 |

Hace 34h

Lebaygue: Il me semble que 3 atc plus un de chaque côté est faisable.

Confirmed

image


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

lens59 |

Hace 34h

lens59: Confirmé

image

As explained it is a player returned other than attack the 5th and after modification of position it passes.


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

Pierabou |

Hace 33h

Yes, that's the crux of the problem.

Either it's authorised and it's a bug that needs fixing.
Or it's not, and so there's a loophole because it can be done. That's the point of my question.

I asked the question some time ago, and the answer was open to interpretation.


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

Sun's |

Hace 31h

lens59: Confirmé

image

Trapeze or triangle formation 📐 ?


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

Pierabou |

Hace 14h

@michbou, do you have any news?


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

michbou |

Hace 13h

Hello
Alas 🥺 no


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

lens59 |

Hace 13h

It looks like an attacking triangle


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

lens59 |

Hace 13h

michbou: Bonjour
Hélas 🥺 non

No what not allowed?


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

michbou |

Hace 12h

lens59: Non quoi pas autorisé ?

No news of my internal request


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

lens59 |

Hace 12h

Ok


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

mick3829 |

Hace 5h

Yes, I asked that question and I'd really like to know too.


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

villa |

Hace 5h

If you block the 5 attacking players, you have to block the 5 defenders or the 5 midfielders.


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

kiki-sainté |

Hace 5h

Frankly, I don't see the problem with 5 defenders or 5 strikers, given that we can have 5 midfielders. Personally, I play with 3 5 2, and sometimes during a match, especially at the end, I play with 5 strikers or 5 defenders.


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

bubulateigne8AnsAprès |

Hace 4h

Debate closed. The MDJ blocked the possibility of playing with 5 strikers.
In short, you score and then switch to a 5-5-0 formation by squeezing your buttocks together, and logically, you're through.
Some great matches ahead.
You'll still have to explain to me why 5 defenders is a yes, 5 midfielders is a yes, 0 strikers is a yes too. But 5 strikers is a no....


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

Pierabou |

Hace 4h

It doesn't really matter. Well, no, we can debate it if we like.

but at least the desired impossibility is blocked.


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

Tazz26 |

Hace 3h

Ridiculous. The game has just regressed. In addition to everything we're seeing at the moment, it's hard to be enthusiastic about the future. Viruafoot is supposed to be entertaining through its game play, not through verbal jousting to settle disputes that 90% of players don't care about.


Este mensaje ha sido traducido. (FR) Mensaje original

Andre Malles |

Hace 1h

I think that it was a bug as you could only have 5 forwards by changing position of one midfielder or defender and if you had 5 forwards you couldn't replace 1 forward with another forward (even in the exact same position), but I'm not sure that I fully agree with the "fix", i.e. I'm not the fan of this restrictions (even though I've never played with 5 forwards, except for some friendlies last season because of the affinity).