myforsans |

9h ago

If you're not looking for a powerful player, don't bother!

Otherwise, this 23-year-old Brazilian striker could be just what you're looking for.
P. Batatinha

With his NG of 32, he can add a 64 attacking bonus
His NG will soon be 35
image](https://i.imgur.com/ss5Gqbm.jpeg)
Versatile in all 6 attacking positions, he offers plenty of tactical possibilities.
For example, if your opponent plays short passes, put the ATC on and it will give you (in addition to the power bonus) an extra short pass bonus.
Auction closes on Tuesday 4 November at 8 p.m.
POS = 10 M
PAD = 35 M
no auction = 1 M
10% discount to LV


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Jallow |

9h ago

1M


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

myforsans |

8h ago

I would like to make it clear that I will not be selling for less than 10 M.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Zeus |

6h ago

2M


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

myforsans |

3h ago

Zeus: 2M

You misread what I wrote above!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Demi-cerveau |

2h ago

3 million!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

myforsans |

2h ago

A really funny and provocative guy like you (sometimes) try to be would have put 9.9 M.
But what you've done here is really disappointing and, above all, pointless.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Drezzo35 |

1h ago

9,9M

Because I like humour 🤪


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

myforsans |

38 min ago

Well, that's what's known as the "comedy of repetition", which isn't the best you can do on the planet of humour...
From now on, the first bid to be made is 10 M (as the 9.9 is null and void)

As for the post polluters, I'll leave it to the admins to apply the rules they wish to apply in such cases.......

And if there's no valid bid by Tuesday evening, don't worry, I'll keep the player :)


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

spoupou |

28 min ago

For a simple auction, it's quite ridiculous to do this every time. It's a real shame, some people pretend not to understand that there's no PDD, which means that the auction logically starts at the PDV, otherwise if the admissions allow bids to be placed below the PDV, this means that there's a PDD of zero, or maybe it's just me, I'm too stupid to understand.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Drezzo35 |

18 min ago

On almost all the posts there are auctions that start well below the sales price and yet I haven't seen a single person complaining about this... If the PDV is reached, all the better for the seller, if not, he can negotiate with the bid closest to the PDV or sell directly on the list or auction, but in no case is it written that it is forbidden to bid below the PDV (moreover, it is the aim of an auction to rise little by little until the price set by the seller is reached...).


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ballounet |

4 min ago

spoupou: Pour une simple enchère c'est assez ridicule de faire ça à chaque fois c'est vraiment dommage il y en a qui font mine de pas comprendre qu'il n'y a pas de PDD se qui veut dire que l'enchère démarre logiquement au PDV sinon si les admis laisse mettre des offres en dessous du PDV cela veut dire qu'il y a un PDD à zéro ou c'est moi je suis peut-être trop bête pour comprendre en tout cas vivement la prochaine saison que le règlement des enchères vfo soit mis à jour

This simply means that the seller can no longer close the sale.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Magpie |

4 min ago

Putting an offer under the POS is not at all problematic, except for the seller's pride.
In practical terms, it's all to the seller's advantage.
Please understand that placing an offer below the POS in no way obliges the seller to accept.
On the other hand, it does oblige the buyer to honour his offer if the seller accepts.
So how does this affect the seller?
It gently pushes up the price, nothing wrong with that. And if, by chance, the seller was bluffing by indicating his refusal to sell under the PDV (I'm not saying that's the case here), well, he has an offer that he can consider, and which binds the person making it.
In short, I'm sorry, I don't want to pollute, I just want to put things into perspective.
Happy selling!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message